Hi Anthony,
On Thursday 29 March 2007 04:07, you wrote:
> Axel Zeuner wrote:
> > Hi Anthony,
> >
> > On Monday 26 March 2007 01:44, you wrote:
> >> Axel Zeuner wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>>>
Hi Paul,
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 00:53, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > I moved to helper2.c because AFAICT helper.c is compiled with the same
> > > sort of restrictions as op.c which leads to the compile failure.
> >
> > Yes, helper.c is compiled with the global register variables and the code
> > is cal
Hi Avi,
On Sunday 25 March 2007 15:40, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Axel Zeuner wrote:
> > A full featured converter (cvtasm) has a lot of dependencies: it has to
> > support all hosts (M) (with all assembler dialects M') and all targets N,
> > i.e. in the worst case one would end
Hi Anthony,
On Monday 26 March 2007 01:44, you wrote:
> Axel Zeuner wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> The tricky thing I still can't figure out is how to get ASM_SOFTMMU
> >> working. The problem is GLUE(st, SUFFIX) function.
Hi Anthony,
On Monday 26 March 2007 01:46, you wrote:
> Axel Zeuner wrote:
> > On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> Axel Zeuner wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>
>
> > Furthermore I think one should move helper_pshufw() from
> >
On Saturday 24 March 2007 21:15, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Axel Zeuner wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hi Axel,
>
> By adding some GCC4 fixes on top of your patch, I was able to get qemu
> for i386 (on i386) to compile and run. So far, I've only tested a win2k
> guest.
Hi Ant
Hi,
On Saturday 17 March 2007 10:51, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, axel wrote:
> > Why there exist two different blocks for COFF and ELF for x86/x86_64
> > hosts?
>
> Because COFF is used by Windows, and ELF by Linux, and they are
> substantially different?
>
Sorry, I d
