ll is not necessary. That said, it doesn't hurt
> either.
Merci pour la relecture Aurélien.
Richard, what do we do? We remove the potential_page_fault(s); or not?
--
Éric Bischoff
Le mardi 28 février 2017, 06:10:45 CET Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 02/27/2017 10:22 PM, Eric Bischoff wrote:
> > From: Eric Bischoff
> >
> > LPD = LOAD PAIR DISJOINT
> > ---
> >
> > target/s390x/insn-data.def | 4 +++-
> > target/s390x/translate.c | 21 +
> > 2 files
Le samedi 25 février 2017, 10:42:43 CET Richard Henderson a écrit :
> On 02/23/2017 10:58 PM, Eric Bischoff wrote:
> > +/* LOAD PAIR DISJOINT */
> > +C(0xc804, LPD, SSF, ILA, m1_32s, m2_32s, 0, r3_P32, movx, 0)
> > +C(0xc805, LPDG,SSF, ILA, m1_64, m2_64, 0, r3_P64, movx, 0)
>
>
the alter-
nate path.
Therefore I think that setting CC = 0 is the correct emulation.
I assumed that putting 0 in last column of C() macro was the way to set CC =
0. I apologize if that was wrong, and if so, please tell me, and I'll correct.
Best,
--
Éric Bischoff
