On Friday 31 August 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> You're overriding what "qemu my_pc" means. "qemu my_pc" create a QEMU
> vm with 128m of memory and -hda my_pc with the default network card.
Why should -hda be assumed instead of -c or -c X/config?
> "qemu -c my_pc/config" only has one meaning:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:13:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like a
> "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside. And it is much
> more simple to use "qemu my_pc" than "qemu -c my_pc/config".
If you need th
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 22:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Anthony,
>
> I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like a
> "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside. And it is much
> more simple to use "qemu my_pc" than "qemu -c my_pc/config".
You
On 8/31/07, Andreas Färber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 31.08.2007 um 21:45 schrieb Luca Tettamanti:
>
> > Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> >> Am 25.08.2007 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber:
> >>
> >>> One of the recent patches (dynticks) has broken compilation on Mac
> >>> OS X v10.4. Should thi
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be
like
> > a "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside.
>
> I consider this a super downside.
>
> "If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will u
Hi,
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like
> a "black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside.
I consider this a super downside.
"If you think your users are idiots, only idiots will use it [your
sof
Hi Anthony,
I think passing only the directory name is better because it can be like a
"black box" : the user don't have to know how it is inside. And it is much
more simple to use "qemu my_pc" than "qemu -c my_pc/config".
Regards,
Laurent
--
Am 31.08.2007 um 21:45 schrieb Luca Tettamanti:
Andreas Färber ha scritto:
Am 25.08.2007 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber:
One of the recent patches (dynticks) has broken compilation on Mac
OS X v10.4. Should this work on OS X or should this have been
limited to Linux?
Getting no answer o
Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 25.08.2007 um 09:37 schrieb Andreas F=E4rber:
>
>> One of the recent patches (dynticks) has broken compilation on Mac
>> OS X v10.4. Should this work on OS X or should this have been
>> limited to Linux?
>
> Getting no answer on this I have prepared a quickfix which
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 15:09 -0400, Christopher Friedt wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > I have no idea what you're talking about. QEMU doesn't care whether you
> > use a physical disk or a file. It handles geometry the same way.
> >
> > Is there a concrete example that doesn't work that you
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 16:05 -0300, Jorge Lucángeli Obes wrote:
> On 8/31/07, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It makes little sense to pass a directory when you can pass a config
> > file and assume that the directory the config file is in is the CWD.
> >
> > For instance, if vm.cfg
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 03:09:19PM -0400, Christopher Friedt wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >I have no idea what you're talking about. QEMU doesn't care whether you
> >use a physical disk or a file. It handles geometry the same way.
> >
> >Is there a concrete example that doesn't work that yo
On 8/31/07, Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It makes little sense to pass a directory when you can pass a config
> file and assume that the directory the config file is in is the CWD.
>
> For instance, if vm.cfg contained just the command line arguments, you
> could have:
>
> MyImage/v
Anthony Liguori wrote:
I have no idea what you're talking about. QEMU doesn't care whether you
use a physical disk or a file. It handles geometry the same way.
Is there a concrete example that doesn't work that you think should?
Yes, a simple example is running CentOS after a typical instal
It makes little sense to pass a directory when you can pass a config
file and assume that the directory the config file is in is the CWD.
For instance, if vm.cfg contained just the command line arguments, you
could have:
MyImage/vm.cfg:-hda disk0.qcow -m 512
MyImage/disk0.qcow:
And t
Hi all,
The last time this issue was discussed, the executable-directory idea
gained more consensus than the snapshot-based idea. This patch
implements my perception of the first idea. Non-Windows for now, as I
can't test on a Windows system. Suggestions and constructive criticism
more than welcom
Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > > * ppc: adds -fno-section-anchors to OP_CFLAGS, as dyngen isn't prepared
> > >to deal with the relocs resulting from using section anchors
> >
> > Maybe this should be handled more generally then, not ppc spec
Hi,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > * ppc: adds -fno-section-anchors to OP_CFLAGS, as dyngen isn't prepared
> >to deal with the relocs resulting from using section anchors
>
> Maybe this should be handled more generally then, not ppc specific, like
> other "offending" compi
18 matches
Mail list logo
