On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:01:50PM +0200, Daniel Schwen wrote:
> Would it be possible to register a set of io ports and io memory locations
> with qemu and have all read write operations passed on to the host system?
>
> A quick look at the source shows me the two look-up tables
> IOPortReadFunc
Hi,
On 19/06/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attached is a simple patch (for 0.9.0 and current cvs), that allows:
-usbdevice touchscreen
which behaves the same as touchpad, except the coordinates are screen
coordinates instead of scaled 32768 coordinates.
This makes qemu com
Attached is a simple patch (for 0.9.0 and current cvs), that allows:
-usbdevice touchscreen
which behaves the same as touchpad, except the coordinates are screen
coordinates instead of scaled 32768 coordinates.
This makes qemu compatible with tslib, often used by xserver-kdrive.
tslib does not
There is someone that is working on a rewriting the
qemu/qemu-0.9.0/target-i386/op.c in asm for PowerPC and the using the big sets
of registers of PowerPc insted of emulation of X86 register with memory?
thanks
Roberto Innocenti
Would it be possible to register a set of io ports and io memory locations
with qemu and have all read write operations passed on to the host system?
A quick look at the source shows me the two look-up tables
IOPortReadFunc *ioport_read_table[3][MAX_IOPORTS];
IOPortWriteFunc *ioport_write_table[
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:13:04PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> I already sent a patch for this to the list:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2007-06/msg00185.html
>
Indeed that is the correct way to fix that. Anybody to commit this
patch?
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | G
Paul Brook wrote:
> On Thursday 24 May 2007, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> while playing around with TLS on i386 i came across this problem which
>> occurs even when no TLS is used at all. If two threads just malloc()
>> memory all the time I get a segmentation fault after a short time. M
Hello;
Do any of the fixes applied recently to rtl8139 fixes the 32 bit VISTA
network problem? 64bit VISTA works just fine.
Thank you
Adnan
