Is there a reason to not use the semi-standard -rfbauth argument?
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Paul Brook 07/02/22 01:48:01
Modified files:
. : gdbstub.c gdbstub.h monitor.c vl.c
Log message:
Allow gdbstub to connect over any serial device.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs
Stefan Weil wrote:
> With your change, both serial ports are connected to
> the same virtual console which results in a funny
> but unwanted behaviour.
>
> My patch fixes this.
Thanks. I expanded it slightly ...
> The patch also modifies the BIOS check. It is now
> possible to load a BIOS with l
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer 07/02/21 22:43:42
Modified files:
hw : mips_malta.c
Log message:
Fix initialisation of serial/parallel ports, spotted by Stefan Weil.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcv
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer 07/02/21 22:32:19
Modified files:
hw : mips_malta.c
Log message:
Allow arbitrary MIPS BIOS sizes between 0 and 4 MB, by Stefan Weil.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs
With your change, both serial ports are connected to
the same virtual console which results in a funny
but unwanted behaviour.
My patch fixes this.
The patch also modifies the BIOS check. It is now
possible to load a BIOS with less than 4 MiB.
What about my patch for EEPROM 24C01 / 24C02
emulati
> I saw Paul Brook's answer in the mail archive, that SH4 port is quite
> functional, so am I missing something? Is he talking about the
> user-mode sh4 port?
I was running sh2 binaries with the usermode emulator.
I have never tried sh4 binaries or the system emulation bits.
Paul
__
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer 07/02/21 17:25:30
Modified files:
. : vl.c
Log message:
Increase the number of multiplexed monitor devices.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qemu/vl.c?cvsroot=qemu&
On Wednesday 21 Feb 2007, Ben Taylor wrote:
> Robin Atwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 Feb 2007, Julian Seward wrote:
> > > (replying off list)
> > >
> > > So you have Solaris 10 (x86 ?) running on qemu-0.9 ? Is it stable?
> > > Does it work? I have it running on vmware-5.
Robin Atwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 Feb 2007, Julian Seward wrote:
> > (replying off list)
> >
> > So you have Solaris 10 (x86 ?) running on qemu-0.9 ? Is it stable?
> > Does it work? I have it running on vmware-5.5.3 but would prefer to
> > move to running it on qemu
Hi,
I'm quite new to qemu, and i'm getting interested in the port of an OS
to SH4. I rapidly tried to get sh4-softmmu qemu working (with the
files/bootloader provided by Samuel Tardieu and Alexis Polti), but
without any results. (I use the 0.9.0 version).
$ ./qemu-system-sh4 -kernel nothing
On Wednesday 21 Feb 2007, Ben Taylor wrote:
> Robin Atwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This has been driving me mad! I have just installed Solaris 10 under Qemu
> > and specified the Xorg server to be used. I created xorg.conf with
> > xorgconfig and X started fine at 1024x768 using the Cir
On Wednesday 21 Feb 2007, Julian Seward wrote:
> (replying off list)
>
> So you have Solaris 10 (x86 ?) running on qemu-0.9 ? Is it stable?
> Does it work? I have it running on vmware-5.5.3 but would prefer to
> move to running it on qemu if possible; however I've had mixed
> results with qemu in
Robin Atwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This has been driving me mad! I have just installed Solaris 10 under Qemu and
> specified the Xorg server to be used. I created xorg.conf with xorgconfig and
> X started fine at 1024x768 using the Cirrus driver. When I edited xorg.conf
> to specif
This has been driving me mad! I have just installed Solaris 10 under Qemu and
specified the Xorg server to be used. I created xorg.conf with xorgconfig and
X started fine at 1024x768 using the Cirrus driver. When I edited xorg.conf
to specify a 1280x1024 display, the Xorg.0.log file showed "no m
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 11:22 PM Lonnie Mendez wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-02-20 at 13:09 +0900, Kazu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After I used TAP device by -net nic -net tap,ifname=mytap and I tried to
use
>> user mode network by -net nic -net user, a Windows XP guest doesn't get
>> IP address from
16 matches
Mail list logo
