Hi all,
I am running a Centrino Duo on Windows XP Home SP2.
Here's the problem...
I want to run the option "-smp 2" with QEMU, but when I start it, it
says it cannot find cpu1. When I look into task manager and the
affinity, it's running on CPU0, but if I use imagecfg to set QEMU to run
on C
Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/12/07, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering if I can do this - running FC4 inside Qemu on Sparc. From
> > > opensolaris website, it seems that qemu 0.8.2 can be
On 2/12/07, Ben Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am wondering if I can do this - running FC4 inside Qemu on Sparc. From
> opensolaris website, it seems that qemu 0.8.2 can be built but not sure
if
> it can work correctly.
>
> http://www.opens
Neo Jia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am wondering if I can do this - running FC4 inside Qemu on Sparc. From
> opensolaris website, it seems that qemu 0.8.2 can be built but not sure if
> it can work correctly.
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/
The current 0.9.0 CVS
Alexander Voropay a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> This patch replaces hardcoded MIPS Malta bootloader with "soft" version.
> This preserves ROM area clean. Also it initializes MIPS $sp register as
> YAMON does.
>
Well this patch looks basically ok, except that
- It's not possible anymore for an OS to jmp
This patch against current CVS is an update of the previously posted Solaris
TAP patch. This small change fixes a large performance problem with
inbound packets (scp, ftp). The author found that some packets were
concatenated, which was the reason for the poor performance. This patch
fixes th
hi,
I am wondering if I can do this - running FC4 inside Qemu on Sparc. From
opensolaris website, it seems that qemu 0.8.2 can be built but not sure if
it can work correctly.
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/
Your comments will be appreciated!
Thanks,
Neo
--
I would remember that if
On 2/5/07, Marko Kohtala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fabrice Bellard:
>Marko Kohtala wrote:
>
>Hi.
>
>With the attached patch I am able to use Kodak Advantix FD 300 APS
>scanner from Win98 when hosted under Linux ix86. It adds EPP support
>and fixes some register bits to match real
Rob Landley schrieb:
On Friday 09 February 2007 6:06 pm, Paul Brook wrote:
Sure, but there are plenty of other ways to accidentally mess up the
permissions of a disk image file. A while back I had to strace qemu to
figure out why file modifications were vanishing after rebooting the
VM; the c
> > If you really want to do this, do it properly. Make it an error to use a
> > ro image if the user [implicitly] requests rw access.
>
> If there's no middle ground between "silently misbehave" and "refuse to
> start if anything _might_ be wrong", then why does current qemu warn about
> the 1024
On Friday 09 February 2007 6:06 pm, Paul Brook wrote:
> > Sure, but there are plenty of other ways to accidentally mess up the
> > permissions of a disk image file. A while back I had to strace qemu to
> > figure out why file modifications were vanishing after rebooting the
> > VM; the culprit turn
Hi!
This patch replaces hardcoded MIPS Malta bootloader with "soft" version.
This preserves ROM area clean. Also it initializes MIPS $sp register as
YAMON does.
The GPR values before execution:
=== less /tmp/qemu.log ===
pc=0x80294040 HI=0x000
On Feb 12, 2007, at 6:17 PM, Jernej Simončič wrote:
On Monday, February 12, 2007, 9:55:25, Krister Joas wrote:
You should take a look at that executable. On most systems I know, /
usr/bin/which is a csh script. It has to be because it also finds
aliases. It may or may not be portable to use
On 12 févr. 07, at 07:54, Ilya Shar wrote:
I am trying to step through i386-darwin-user/qemu-i386
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not
access memory.
Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x2115eaf5
helper_cmpxchg8b () at ../cpu-all.h:344
344 ((uint32_t *)ptr)[0] = x
On Monday, February 12, 2007, 9:55:25, Krister Joas wrote:
> You should take a look at that executable. On most systems I know, /
> usr/bin/which is a csh script. It has to be because it also finds
> aliases. It may or may not be portable to use 'which', I'm not
> really sure, but it's not
Have a look here with links and a description:
http://www.friedhoff.org/fscaps.html
http://www.friedhoff.org/fscaps.html#Qemu
Serges patch is in the mm tree.
Chris
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 15:11:00 +
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way around this? I expected to be able
On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is one I introduced in the gcc-3.x autodetect. It's against
CVS from a little while ago so hopefully it's just fuzz.
AFAICT "which" is not really portable,
17 matches
Mail list logo
