Hi,
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:49:23PM +0200, Thorsten Zitterell wrote:
>
>> the attached file includes preliminary support for the Intel XScale CPU.
> You don't seem to truncate acc0 to 40 bits? The DSP coprocessor in
> non-iWMMXt xscale cores does truncate, and some
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 11:49:23PM +0200, Thorsten Zitterell wrote:
> the attached file includes preliminary support for the Intel XScale CPU.
> I have also written code which emulates a Gumstix [1] system in QEMU -
> based on this processor - and got a Linux kernel up and running.
You don't seem
Hi,
the attached file includes preliminary support for the Intel XScale CPU.
I have also written code which emulates a Gumstix [1] system in QEMU -
based on this processor - and got a Linux kernel up and running.
Could you please apply this patch to CVS?
Comments?
I will send further patches if
Am 04.10.2006 um 20:30 schrieb Pablo Virolainen:
Ottavio Caruso kirjoitti:
From: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Due to some personal problems (related to financial situations) I'm
no
longer being able to keep paying the server which hosts the QEMU
forum.
Therefore, I'm looking for someo
Ottavio Caruso kirjoitti:
From: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Due to some personal problems (related to financial situations) I'm
no
longer being able to keep paying the server which hosts the QEMU
forum.
Therefore, I'm looking for someone who can host the QEMU forum
(and,
if possible, th
Hello,
I tried to run MS Virtual PC 2004 in Win under qEmu.
Got Virtual PC Message:
"Virtual PC is incompatible with the phisical processor in this computer.
Virtual PC requires at least Pentium II (or equivalent) processor."
However, QEMU presents its virtual CPU as "Pentium II" stepping C0.
> From: "Hetz Ben Hamo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Due to some personal problems (related to financial situations) I'm
> no
> longer being able to keep paying the server which hosts the QEMU
> forum.
>
> Therefore, I'm looking for someone who can host the QEMU forum
> (and,
> if possible, the nightl
Hi,
the priority array of the gic_state structure contains 96 elements but
gic_set_running_irq is also called with irq == 1023 so that without the
fix some random value is used for s->running_priority.
The printf patch is necessary to make the DPRINTFs work.
Index: arm_gic.c
==
