Re: [Qemu-devel] Asking about IDE to develop Qemu

2006-06-22 Thread Christian MICHON
On 6/22/06, Tieu Ma Dau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I'm working a project which develops Qemu running on MinGW/MSys but I don't know which IDE I should use to develop, to test, to debug Qemu source code: http://www.eclipse.org: generic IDE in java http://www.eclipse.org/cdt: what will ma

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI

2006-06-22 Thread Anthony Liguori
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: Part of that should be to determine what the GUI will actually do; You're getting ahead of yourself. Just getting qemu to start with wxWidgets instead of SDL would be a big step in the right direction. At this point you're talking about embedding the Qemu guest window

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI

2006-06-22 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:50:10 -0500 Anthony Liguori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fabrice Bellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last > > posts on the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best > > as it is reasonnably portable and becaus

Re: [Qemu-devel] [ot?] Vista Networking

2006-06-22 Thread Mattia Gentilini (QD)
Paul Brook wrote: >> qemu -hda disk0.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user -m 512 -soundhw >> sb16 > Could be a bug in the rtl8139 emulation. I couldn't get it to work with the > Realtek drivers. Unofortunately rtl8139 is the only NIC supported by vista, among those provided by QEMU. I obtained the

Re: [Qemu-devel] Asking about IDE to develop Qemu

2006-06-22 Thread Paul Brook
> 2. OR: I should develop Qemu on Linux and use KDevelop IDE. > And I can do all with KDevelop: develop, test, debug Qemu. And if I want > Qemu running on MinGW/MSys, I must transfer the souce code, which were > already developped with KDevelop, to Windows installed MinGW/MSys and > recompile

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI

2006-06-22 Thread Anthony Liguori
Fabrice Bellard wrote: Hi, Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last posts on the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best as it is reasonnably portable and because it uses the native GUIs. I think the first step is to validate whether wxWidgets will be ad

[Qemu-devel] Asking about IDE to develop Qemu

2006-06-22 Thread Tieu Ma Dau
Hi all, I'm working a project which develops Qemu running on MinGW/MSys but I don't know which IDE I should use to develop, to test, to debug Qemu source code: 1. I should use VC++ on Windows: in this case, I must configure VC++ to use mingw-gcc (in place of  the default compiler of VC++. In m

[Qemu-devel] Anybody working on a USB EHCI driver?

2006-06-22 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Is anybody working on creating an EHCI driver for the USB subsystem? I have a need to access high speed devices and wanted to find out if I'd be re-inventing the wheel before I start on this. -- Don Dugger "Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse." - D. Gale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: (303)440-1368 __

Re: [Qemu-devel] [ot?] Vista Networking

2006-06-22 Thread Paul Brook
On Thursday 22 June 2006 20:45, Brian Wheeler wrote: > Has anyone gotten this to work? I'm probably missing something obvious. > Here's the command line I'm using (on linux with a CVS from today): > > qemu -hda disk0.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user -m 512 -soundhw > sb16 Could be a bug in th

[Qemu-devel] [ot?] Vista Networking

2006-06-22 Thread Brian Wheeler
Has anyone gotten this to work? I'm probably missing something obvious. Here's the command line I'm using (on linux with a CVS from today): qemu -hda disk0.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user -m 512 -soundhw sb16 Vista is installed and I manually set the IP to 10.0.2.15 and the gateway to 10.0

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI

2006-06-22 Thread gbeauchesne
Hi, > If people are interested, we could try to port Q as a base, since > it's going to be obsolete anyway (either by the new QEMU GUI or > leopard)... :) I would be interested in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT, Basilisk II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-) That could imply the use of an i

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI

2006-06-22 Thread gbeauchesne
Hi, > If people are interested, we could try to port Q as a base, since > it's going to be obsolete anyway (either by the new QEMU GUI or > leopard)... :) I would be in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT, Basilisk II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-) That could imply the use of an internal con

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] mips-user socket-related syscall support

2006-06-22 Thread Raphaël Rigo
Raphaël Rigo wrote: > Fabrice Bellard wrote: >> Another point is that doing: >> >> +target_long args[6]; >> + >> +tputl(args, arg1); >> +tputl(args+1, arg2); >> +tputl(args+2, arg3); >> +tputl(args+3, arg4); >> +tputl(args+4, arg5); >> +tputl(args+5, arg6); >> >> at the

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Sparc64 BPr branch target fix

2006-06-22 Thread Blue Swirl
Fix the BPr instruction branch target calculation. Index: qemu/target-sparc/translate.c === --- qemu.orig/target-sparc/translate.c 2006-06-22 14:50:51.0 + +++ qemu/target-sparc/translate.c 2006-06-22 15:52:00.0

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Soft float for Sparc32/64 (update)

2006-06-22 Thread Blue Swirl
Other than it didn't apply against the current CVS? Was there a requirement for a previous patch you posted which hasn't been applied to CVS? Fabrice applied it yesterday. _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI

2006-06-22 Thread Christian MICHON
On 6/21/06, Fabrice Bellard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last posts on the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best as it is reasonnably portable and because it uses the native GUIs. If someone is interested, I am ready t

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU GUI

2006-06-22 Thread Luca Barbato
Fabrice Bellard wrote: > Hi, > > Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last posts on > the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best as it is > reasonnably portable and because it uses the native GUIs. wx is nasty at best. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo/linux Gentoo/P

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Soft float for Sparc32/64 (update)

2006-06-22 Thread Ben Taylor
Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Last time I missed a lot of the functions, this version should be complete. > I see no difference in operation with or without the patch. Comments? Other than it didn't apply against the current CVS? Was there a requirement for a previous patch you