malc a écrit :
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm new with qemu.
>> I install qemu and kqemu by download and compile the sources
>> qemu-0.8.0 and kqemu-0.7.2 on a debian testing
>> I try to install windows xp pro upgrade version (official) , the boot
>> start a
It looks like qemu (at least version 0.7.2, which is what I'm running
here) doesn't set SO_REUSEADDR before calling bind(), which makes that
fairly useless. This obvious patch moves up setting SO_REUSEADDR to the
right place, just before bind().
Apologies if this is already fixed in 0.8.0.
-- ko
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:10:02PM -, Farina, Jonathan wrote:
> Paul, thanks for the link.
>
> That project looks dead. Can't link to the CVS and the page hasn't
> been updated since March 05. Anyone know of any updated project
> branch or has the functionality been merged into the main proj
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, De Leeuw Guy wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new with qemu.
I install qemu and kqemu by download and compile the sources
qemu-0.8.0 and kqemu-0.7.2 on a debian testing
I try to install windows xp pro upgrade version (official) , the boot
start and after different stages
windows ask m
On Monday 16 January 2006 15:10, Farina, Jonathan wrote:
> Paul, thanks for the link.
>
> That project looks dead. Can't link to the CVS
Huh? CVS works fine here.
> and the page hasn't been
> updated since March 05. Anyone know of any updated project branch or has
> the functionality been mer
> Jürgen has stated his desired functionality already. What other "main
> uses" are there? (Asked in the hope of further sparking the discussion ;)
I use the usermode emulation fairly extensively for cross development/testing.
User emulation has three main advantages for our purposes:
- It's sign
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
KQEMU and qvm86 already do that
El 16/01/2006, a las 9:31, Farina, Jonathan escribió:
Hi,
I'm new to the list, so forgive me if this has been asked before...
Has anyone thought of adjusting Qemu to be a Virtualiser rather
than an emulator? Or a
Paul, thanks for the link.
That project looks dead. Can't link to the CVS and the page hasn't been
updated since March 05. Anyone know of any updated project branch or has the
functionality been merged into the main project?
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Paul Brook [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Hello all,
I'm new with qemu.
I install qemu and kqemu by download and compile the sources
qemu-0.8.0 and kqemu-0.7.2 on a debian testing
I try to install windows xp pro upgrade version (official) , the boot
start and after different stages
windows ask me to change the cdrom and put a valid versio
(It looks like the author forgot to announce his pathces on the
mailing list, and just put them on the forum).
Anyway, you're invited to see this thread about some new USB patches
and comments.
http://qemu.dad-answers.com/viewtopic.php?t=704
Thanks,
Hetz
___
Hello,
as I promised I will send QEMU patches even if I don't know about QEMU's patch
policy ... Here a more complex one:
serial.c (and vl.h):
(1) sending break
(2) outgoing modem state
(3) incomming modem state
(4) CHECK THIS: support to disable interrupts (a PC feature)
in vl.c (and vl.h):
(1
For some as-yet-unknown reason, the IP assigned by the user-net DHCP
server occasionally switches to 10.0.2.16. I suspect this happens while
renewing the lease while I'm away, since that would explain why the
headless VM is unreachable when I come back on mondays - then when booting
with SDL displ
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Using legacy apps is clearly an interesting topic for QEMU. With the
> improved dynamic translator written by Paul Brook (but not merged yet),
> QEMU will be far less dependent of C compiler and porting the dynamic
> translator to a new host wi
> Has anyone thought of adjusting Qemu to be a Virtualiser rather than an
> emulator? Or a combination of both? This would allow a Linux host to run
> Windows at 95% speed? Or from my point of view allow the new OS X (x86)
> Host to run a Windows client?
http://www.qvm86.org/
Paul
___
Hi (on my 1st try some lines at the end of the patch were missing)
as I promised I will send QEMU patches even if I don't know about QEMU's patch
policy ... Here a very simple one:
Index: hw/ne2000.c
===
RCS file: /home/Cvsroot/qemu/
Hello,
although I will integrate this into my patchset this not a proposed patch
for qemu. This hack just shows that the current implementation of updating
the emulated screen is inefficient and needs improvements.
(1) 1280 px width does not work well (16 bit only) - too slow to be usefull
(2) 102
Hi,
as I promised I will send QEMU patches even if I don't know about QEMU's patch
policy ... Here a very simple one:
Index: hw/ne2000.c
===
RCS file: /home/Cvsroot/qemu/hw/ne2000.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -B -b -U3 -r1.1.1
> > cannot add sdC1!dos [63,966798) to disk [0,966735): partition boundaries
> > out of range
>
> Note that the difference of the larger numbers is exactly 63...
>
> It might be fixed by replacing the line
>
> s->sector_count=0xec04f;
>
> with
>
> s->sector_count=0xec04f - 63;
>
> in
Hi,
I'm
new to the list, so forgive me if this has been asked before...
Has
anyone thought of adjusting Qemu to be a Virtualiser rather than an emulator? Or
a combination of both? This would allow a Linux host to run Windows at 95%
speed? Or from my point of view allow the new OS X (
19 matches
Mail list logo
