On Wednesday 21 December 2005 01:52, Darrin Ritter wrote:
> Hi I am using the 0.8.0 version of qemu, previously I was able to get
> the user net to work with
> qemu hd.img -user-net
>
> with the 0.8.0 version I have been trying to start qemu with
> qemu-system-x86_64 /home/dv/qemu/hd.img -net user
Hi I am using the 0.8.0 version of qemu, previously I was able to get
the user net to work with
qemu hd.img -user-net
with the 0.8.0 version I have been trying to start qemu with
qemu-system-x86_64 /home/dv/qemu/hd.img -net user
how ever the user network isnt working
I think that I am using the
Hi to all,
I'm intrested to try a compile the source FOR an ARM HOST but I need some hints
to start...
I never found any howto...but maybe my research are only unlucky ...
Can someone help me?
Thanks
Qtek 9090 Wm 2003se
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Windows NT 3.1, 3.5 and 3.51.
Some versions (I have a retail workstation and server 3.51 that don't
fail, but MSDN 3.51 fail) have problems with CPU detection.
Microsoft has a KB article regarding that with VPC.
Regards,
Natalia Portillo
El 20/
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 20:56, Juergen Lock wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 11:28:27PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > Teaching the slirp code how to do tcp backoff/window scaling is probably
> > a fair amount of work. The easy alternative is to throttle the slirp
> > output when we know the car
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 11:28:27PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> Dan mentioned he was seeing very poor network performance when using
> user-net.
> It turns out this is because packets were getting dropped (the NIC buffers
> were full), and the slirp code doesn't throttle properly when this occurs
All,
I am happy to announce the first release of Argos: a full system
emulator (based on Qemu) that detects attempts to compromise the system.
It is meant to be used in a honeypot and offers full-system protection,
i.e., it protects the kernel and all applications running on top.
Argos is ho
On Tuesday, December 20, 2005, 11:35:54, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> I'll include a version of "/usr/local/bin/qemu" specially compiled for
>> WinNT-3.1 guests (cpu identification).
> Is that Win-3.1 or NT-3.5 or NT-4.0? Is there a patch?
That looks like Windows NT 3.1 to me.
--
< Jernej Simo
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 19.12.2005, at 23:35, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>
> > Does -fno-tree-ch works on PC ?
>
> Yes. However using it might introduce a performance hit.
I think Fabrice meant does the -fno-tree-ch trick works on x86 with gcc4
too? The answer is no.
__
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Daniel Egger wrote:
> On 19.12.2005, at 23:35, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
>
> > Does -fno-tree-ch works on PC ?
>
> Yes. However using it might introduce a performance hit.
Why not just test for Darwin *and* for GCC 4, and be done with it?
Ciao,
Dscho
_
Hi,
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> I'll include a version of "/usr/local/bin/qemu" specially compiled for
> WinNT-3.1 guests (cpu identification).
Is that Win-3.1 or NT-3.5 or NT-4.0? Is there a patch?
Ciao,
Dscho
___
Qemu-devel mailin
Built and tested!
It works great now, thanks alot.
New OS X Builds are up.
Mike
On 19.12.2005, at 19:21, Joachim Henke wrote:
...just to end this thread (c:
The problem is fixed in todays CVS. Compling QEMU with GCC 3.3 on
Mac OS X now works again: Running FreeDOS and Doom timedemo don't
On 19.12.2005, at 23:35, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Does -fno-tree-ch works on PC ?
Yes. However using it might introduce a performance hit.
Servus,
Daniel
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
QEMU version 0.8.0 is out ! You can get it from:
great, thanks for your and all of the contributors work.
--
Regards,
Adrian Smarzewski
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinf
14 matches
Mail list logo
