On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Jim C. Brown wrote:
I tried using libnet 1.0 to send the packets, but that did not help. Also
tried libnet 1.1, that actually allowed the host to be pinged by the guest -
part of the time. It also caused pings on the same lan (from the guest) to fail
as well sometimes, so it
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Vitaly Belostotsky wrote:
I've encountered some network related bug when using qemu with tun
and I'm willing to debug it but could you please provide some help.
you may want to try upgrading to the host kernel to 2.6.12. Had quite a
bit of issues with tun devices "hanging
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 11:02:04AM -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote:
> >
> > b) can't talk to the host itself. This is due to the packets going
> > directly to the wire and never really "seen" by the host stack. Not sure
> > yet if there is an easy way out, but I suppose it may be possible to set
> >
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:30:23 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They were unable to transfer domain ownership to the new host. And since it
> wasn't renewed, it expired.
>
> I think it's temporarily on 'hold' by the registrar, so the owner can still
> renew it, but that never lasts long.
We're
Dear QEMU developers!
This is my first post to this list so please don't be very angry
if I'm doing something wrong.
I've encountered some network related bug when using qemu with tun
and I'm willing to debug it but could you please provide some help.
The bug isn't new, I believe it's described
$B!Z(B $B1|MM$N2V1`$KL5NA$4>7BT$N8"MxH/@8$G$9(B $B![(B
$B:#!"EEOCG'>Z$9$k$H#1#2#0#0#01_J,$N%]%$%s%H$,L5NA$G$b$i$($^$9!#(B
http://live.livedear.com/?num=0012000
$B"($3$N%a!<%k$,[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"$J$?$N$46a=j1|MM$r<+F0E*$K$4>R2p$9$k%7%9%
"U n d e r a c h i e v e r"
> I wanted to submit a new OS image (CentOS 4 on x86) to FreeOSZoo.org.
>
> I'm getting taken to what looks like a search or cyber-squatter's site.
> Any idea what's up?
They were unable to transfer domain ownership to the new host. And since it
wasn't renewed, it ex
U n d e r a c h i e v e r wrote:
Hi
I wanted to submit a new OS image (CentOS 4 on x86) to FreeOSZoo.org.
I'm getting taken to what looks like a search or cyber-squatter's site.
Any idea what's up?
$ dig freeoszoo.org +nodebug +noadditional +nostats +noquery
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> freeoszoo.org
Hi
I wanted to submit a new OS image (CentOS 4 on x86) to FreeOSZoo.org.
I'm getting taken to what looks like a search or cyber-squatter's site.
Any idea what's up?
$ dig freeoszoo.org +nodebug +noadditional +nostats +noquery
; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> freeoszoo.org +nodebug +noadditional +nostats
+no
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 09:50:11AM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Jim C. Brown wrote:
>
> I didn't mean to implement this in qemu directly, but rather in a helper
> similar to vdeq, but the primary method should be via vde_switch. Having
> this shortcut helper is a future
Ooooppss,
Sorry Jim, I completly forgot to send you glade file I promise.
Maybe it can give you some idea for your gui design...
Thank you for your work.
Bye.
PS : This file works with glade 2.6.8.
--
Sebastien Bechet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
av7.net
qgui.glade.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed
On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Jim C. Brown wrote:
Yes, but if one was running multiple qemu guests, it would be cleaner to
implement this thru vde_switch instead of in qemu directly. That way eth0 is
intercepted by only a single process. (Also no worries about having permissions
to intercept packets and
12 matches
Mail list logo
