Hi,
I just talked to ev1servers and I'm renting a full new server within
the next 24 hours (I'm actually waiting right now for their
confirmation call). Judging from their history and their time in this
business, I think the situation will be much better (and the transfer
limit is 1000GB per month
Ouch!
Would it be a good idea to have it hosted on FreeOSZoo?
After all, he did originally set up one.
Maybe you could just move your backup there? (Assuming he's willing, etc.
He might not be, since it's a university server. You might not be allowed
access to it as admin, etc.)
I hope you
Le Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:30:40 +0100, Tim Walker a écrit :
> Cross compile to Windows from Linux is an unknown quantity to me - has
> anyone tried it yet with QEMU?
the win32 installers on FreeOSZoo are build on a linux box :)
> Tim
___
Qemu-devel
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 22:30 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
> Thanks for the replies.
>
> I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
> booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
> platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
>
Thanks for the replies.
I thought the Live CD was a bad idea until I realised it can still be
booted under QEMU for non x86 users (Live CDs can be created for other
platforms - have to pick one otherwise it'd be a nightmare). The
tradeoff would be speed for x86 users vs ease of image maintenan
"John R. Hogerhuis"
>
> I can't say. But even if it were, I'd guess most here would rather work
> under Unix-like OS.
Undoubtably.
The Linux builders outnumber the Win builders by probably 50 to one. If not
more.
But I know from the effort I went through to get qemu to build under windows
th
Hi People,
I just found out that my hosting provider (ExecutiveASP) went out of
business (it was a 1 man show and he's served a warrant), and my
(virtual) server disappeared without any prior notification. All
attempts to contact ExecutiveASP were failed.
I'll try to see if I have any backup of t
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 14:13 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "John R. Hogerhuis"
>
> > BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> > to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> > contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testin
$B40A4L5NA!J#1K|1_J,!K$G$P$C$A$j%5%]!<%H!*$H$-$a$/$h$&$JAGE($JNx0&C5$7!#(B
http://awg.webchu.com/?lover
$B"'"&"'"&"'"&"'"&"'"&"'"&"'"&(B
$B%a8r49Ey$N>r7o;XDj$GAjhttp://awg.webchu.com/?lover
$B!#!y!A$3$N2F$K8~$1$F9,J!$rhttp://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
"John R. Hogerhuis"
> BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
Does the ReactOS build work well enough to do Mingw etc. deve
"Christian MICHON"
>untrue.
>http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/trial/default.mspx
>
>that would give 6 months to complete development...
I think they did one of them for a year.
However, I doubt they'd appreciate you distributing anything of theirs...
Can ReactOS be used to
Amazing, Amazing, Amazing!!! I think i had stumbled upon VDE before, but
dismissed it. Thanks for pointing it out to me! This looks like it is perfect
for what I want to accomplish.
--
Wolfgang Richter
-- Original message --
From: Tom Sandholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED
"Tero Kaarlela"
>I tried to boot linuxppc image from freeoszoo with QemuCVS. kernel
> boots ok but then I get errors that it cant read filesystem from dev hda.
>Also tried with 0.7.0 and it freezes at: Freeing unused kernel memory
What's the date of the disk image itself?
Late last year
Hi,
I tried to boot linuxppc image from freeoszoo with QemuCVS. kernel
boots ok but then I get errors that it cant read filesystem from dev hda.
Also tried with 0.7.0 and it freezes at: Freeing unused kernel memory
my boot command line was: 0.7.0 qemu-system-ppc -prep -kernel
zimage.pr
Is it possible to network multiple sessions of QEMU so they appear to be
on the same simulated network?
--
Wolfgang Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http
> BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
>
untrue.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/trial/default.msp
Absolutely!
Use vde-networking to create a router/tunnel from your host-os to all
of your qemu-instances.
see..
http://vde.sourceforge.net/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/vde/
- Tom Sandholm
Wolfgang Richter wrote:
Is it possible to network multiple sessions of QEMU so they appear to be
o
On Fri, Jun 24, 2005 at 02:31:35PM -0400, Wolfgang Richter wrote:
> Is it possible to network multiple sessions of QEMU so they appear to be
> on the same simulated network?
Try VDE, virtual distributed ethernet.
renzo
___
Qemu-devel mailing li
> For whatever reason I was thinking more along the lines of testing
> historical Windows OSes under QEMU, but good suggestion.
but keep in mind the following. You can install the eval 2003 sp1 on
only one machine. So make it a qemu one :)
Christian
_
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 20:24 +0200, Christian MICHON wrote:
> > BTW, one problem with WIndows is that QEMU developers do not have access
> > to Windows licenses. Might be nice for non-programmers who want to
> > contribute to donate old licensed copies of Windows for testing work.
> >
>
> untrue.
On Fri, 2005-06-24 at 18:19 +0100, Tim Walker wrote:
> Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
> feedback would be appreciated.
>
It's a cool idea, I think. I went through the mingw thing a while back
and it's a PITA. It would be nice to have known working build plat
you would probably need to setup cross compilers at least,
find a global linux config file generic enough (ex: no framebuffer),
and at least a initrd with minimum bins (static busybox would be
best).
This also implies you've a lot of time free :) if you want to do it for
many architectures/targets
Is this a bad idea for some reason, or is it just unnecessary? Some
feedback would be appreciated.
Cheers,
Tim
Tim Walker wrote:
How difficult would it be to create a (presumably Linux) uniform build
environment for all targets as a bootable Qemu image?
___
Alright, found out I was editing the wrong line in the QEMU menu script
file for windows. Now it seems to work a lot better. I am still
wondering if it is possible to setup my guest OS as a bridging interface
within the simulated environment? And with 3 nics can I redirect ports
to individual NI
I am assuming the nics work with -user-net properties, with a simulated
router/firewall DHCP server at 10.0.2.2. Is it possible to manually
assign an IP (such as 10.0.2.5; is 10.0.2.3 still a nameserver?) and
still have access to the internet?
Wolfgang Richter wrote:
>Basically, what I want to a
Basically, what I want to accomplish is this. eth0 and eth1 are in
bridging mode, with eth0 supposedly leading out to the internet, and
eth1 supposedly connecting an internal network to the internet. eth2
connects to a third network, but that doesn't really matter too much.
eth0 wants a few ports
26 matches
Mail list logo
