On Dienstag, 27. September 2022 21:47:02 CEST Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:14:33 +0200
>
> Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> > On Dienstag, 27. September 2022 15:05:13 CEST Linus Heckemann wrote:
> > > One more thing has occurred to me. I think the reclaiming/reopening
> > > logic will
On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:14:33 +0200
Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
> On Dienstag, 27. September 2022 15:05:13 CEST Linus Heckemann wrote:
> > Christian Schoenebeck writes:
> > > Ah, you sent this fix as a separate patch on top. I actually just meant
> > > that you would take my already queued patch
On Dienstag, 27. September 2022 15:05:13 CEST Linus Heckemann wrote:
> Christian Schoenebeck writes:
> > Ah, you sent this fix as a separate patch on top. I actually just meant
> > that you would take my already queued patch as the latest version (just
> > because I had made some minor changes on
Christian Schoenebeck writes:
> Ah, you sent this fix as a separate patch on top. I actually just meant that
> you would take my already queued patch as the latest version (just because I
> had made some minor changes on my end) and adjust that patch further as v4.
>
> Anyway, there are still s
On Montag, 26. September 2022 14:42:06 CEST Linus Heckemann wrote:
> Previously, the yielding in v9fs_reopen_fid and put_fid could result
> in other parts of the code modifying the fid table. This would
> invalidate the hash table iterator, causing misbehaviour.
>
> Now we ensure that we complete