Am 25.07.2022 um 09:38 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
> Add missing job synchronization in the unit tests, with
> explicit locks.
>
> We are deliberately using _locked functions wrapped by a guard
> instead of a normal call because the normal call will be removed
> in future, as the o
On 7/25/22 10:38, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Add missing job synchronization in the unit tests, with
explicit locks.
We are deliberately using _locked functions wrapped by a guard
instead of a normal call because the normal call will be removed
in future, as the only usage is limited to t
Add missing job synchronization in the unit tests, with
explicit locks.
We are deliberately using _locked functions wrapped by a guard
instead of a normal call because the normal call will be removed
in future, as the only usage is limited to the tests.
In other words, if a function like job_paus
