On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 14:37 +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse
>
> At the time kvm_xen_init() is called, hyperv_enabled() doesn't yet work, so
> the correct MSR index to use for the hypercall page isn't known.
>
> Rather than setting it to the default and then shifting it late
On 7 February 2025 15:37:40 GMT, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 07, 2025, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> From: David Woodhouse
>>
>> At the time kvm_xen_init() is called, hyperv_enabled() doesn't yet work, so
>> the correct MSR index to use for the hypercall page isn't known.
>>
>> Rather t
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse
>
> At the time kvm_xen_init() is called, hyperv_enabled() doesn't yet work, so
> the correct MSR index to use for the hypercall page isn't known.
>
> Rather than setting it to the default and then shifting it later for the
> H
From: David Woodhouse
At the time kvm_xen_init() is called, hyperv_enabled() doesn't yet work, so
the correct MSR index to use for the hypercall page isn't known.
Rather than setting it to the default and then shifting it later for the
Hyper-V case with a confusing second call to kvm_init_xen(),
