To quote an old boss of mine "Well, it's an interesting way to resign"
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 Feb 2015, at 21:03, Steve Holden
mailto:st...@holdenweb.com>> wrote:
We can take it you are self-employed, then? ;-)
S
On Feb 4, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Stestagg
mailto:stest...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi T
See! Why would anyone want to remove this reply-to goodness. It's a bug
we've all become to rely on.
On 4 Feb 2015 21:03, "Steve Holden" wrote:
> We can take it you are self-employed, then? ;-)
>
> S
>
> On Feb 4, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Stestagg wrote:
>
> Hi Tom
>
> I'm currently looking for work, a
We can take it you are self-employed, then? ;-)
S
On Feb 4, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Stestagg wrote:
> Hi Tom
>
> I'm currently looking for work, as my current employer is awful, and I pretty
> much hate my boss. Do you have any roles available that could save me from
> this hell?
>
>
--
Steve
Hi Tom
I'm currently looking for work, as my current employer is awful, and I
pretty much hate my boss. Do you have any roles available that could save
me from this hell?
Thanks
Steve
p.s. If you have a referral bonus, I can give you all my colleagues details
too..
j/k ;)
On Wed Feb 04 2015
Cheryl Fay would like to recall the message, "[python-uk] New Year's London
Dojo Next MONDAY".
___
python-uk mailing list
python-uk@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-uk
On 4 February 2015 at 15:49, Steve Holden wrote:
> +1
>
>
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Doug Winter wrote:
On 04/02/15 14:16, Andy Robinson wrote:
I'm one of the list admins. There are a couple of others. Happy to
make a change if a significant majority feel that way.
However, sometimes accidental replies are the only thing keeping the
list alive ;-)
If ev
+1
As long as the list is Cc'd, reply-all works fine. It has the slight
disadvantage that some people might receive a second copy of list messages, but
that's probably better than accidental list messages.
S
On Feb 4, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Marcin Tustin wrote:
> I'm generally persuaded by the ar
But surely the bikeshed should be blue!
Michael
On 4 February 2015 at 15:38, Peter Inglesby
wrote:
> It seems like several of the arguments for keeping the current behaviour
> are that it's amusing when somebody gets it wrong. As somebody who once
> accidentally reply-alled criticism of my sup
It seems like several of the arguments for keeping the current behaviour
are that it's amusing when somebody gets it wrong. As somebody who once
accidentally reply-alled criticism of my supervisor to my entire department
at university, I'm not sure that it always is amusing, and so I'm in favour
o
Accidental replies are the spice of life.
The only downside of the reply-to header is the fact that people randomly
complain about it every other year or two, resulting in 20 arguments in
favour, 20 arguments against, then a discussion about how voting for or
against it might be a good idea, and i
On 04/02/15 14:16, Andy Robinson wrote:
> I'm one of the list admins. There are a couple of others. Happy to
> make a change if a significant majority feel that way.
>
> However, sometimes accidental replies are the only thing keeping the
> list alive ;-)
If everyone has a client that supports
I'm generally persuaded by the arguments against reply-to.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 2:30 PM, xtian wrote:
> I'm pro dropping the reply-to header, it's always awkward when someone
> gets bitten by it. People are much more familiar with the difference
> between reply and reply all now than they were
I'm pro dropping the reply-to header, it's always awkward when someone gets
bitten by it. People are much more familiar with the difference between
reply and reply all now than they were when the reply-to header solution
was devised.
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 14:22 Richard Barran wrote:
> More sensible
These emails all get filtered into a folder for me, it's not hard to do and
it makes it easy to ignore them. If anything I'd prefer more activity on
here, not less.
My 2p worth ;)
Al
___
python-uk mailing list
python-uk@python.org
https://mail.python.or
More sensible, but a lot less fun for us in the popcorn gallery!
> The reverse, people accidentally answering just to the sender instead of the
> whole list, seems better than people accidentally sending private emails to
> everyone.
___
python-uk ma
I seem to recall a debate about this a little while ago. I'm in favour of
dropping the munging. Obligatory link to
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Wed Feb 04 2015 at 2:17:22 PM Andy Robinson wrote:
> I'm one of the list admins. There are a couple of others. Happy to
> make a
On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Andy Robinson wrote:
I'm one of the list admins. There are a couple of others. Happy to
make a change if a significant majority feel that way.
I'm -1 on removing the reply-to. Any group mailing list that
actually wants to be a discussion should default to using it.
--
C
I'm one of the list admins. There are a couple of others. Happy to
make a change if a significant majority feel that way.
However, sometimes accidental replies are the only thing keeping the
list alive ;-)
On 4 February 2015 at 14:12, Sven Marnach wrote:
> Maybe we could just get rid of the po
Maybe we could just get rid of the pointless "Reply-To" header? It can be
disabled by a list admin on the Mailman admin page.
I get the impression that at least one person per month falls victim to
it. The reverse, people accidentally answering just to the sender instead
of the whole list, seems
Spammers gonna spam ;-) Guess we've all done it. S
On Feb 4, 2015, at 7:18 AM, Thomas Hunger wrote:
> Well now, that's a slightly larger audience than I had in mind.
>
> How embarrassing .. I apologise for the spam!
>
>
--
Steve Holden st...@holdenweb.com +1 571 484 6266 @holdenweb
Well now, that's a slightly larger audience than I had in mind.
How embarrassing .. I apologise for the spam!
On 4 February 2015 at 13:11, Thomas Hunger wrote:
> Hi Niamh,
>
> I saw a Skimlinks talk a while back at a London data meetup which was
> super interesting!
>
> In any case: if you are
Hi Niamh,
I saw a Skimlinks talk a while back at a London data meetup which was super
interesting!
In any case: if you are ever looking for an agency to do coding, we just
started one [1]. I worked for Google as an SWE/SRE for several years and
the others have a great technical background as well
22 matches
Mail list logo
