On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Matt Hamilton wrote:
[...]
And then re-running the tests from the same python prompt that was open
just before I wrote that email and I now have the 100ms delay back
again... yet not still in ab. Quitting and starting a new python process
and I still have the delay.
I gue
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:39:23AM +, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> And then re-running the tests from the same python prompt that was
> open just before I wrote that email and I now have the 100ms delay
> back again... yet not still in ab. Quitting and starting a new
> python process and I still have
On 21 Dec 2010, at 10:29, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> I then have a similar issue for the request I mentioned in this thread, that
> happens to be cached by varnish. If I then disable delayed acks on the OSX
> box running the python tests, that speeds up again and I lose the 100ms extra
> latency a
On 20 Dec 2010, at 16:26, Doug Winter wrote:
> Matt Hamilton wrote:
>> I'm off to go dig in the urllib code and see if I can see anything
>> there. I'm wondering if urllib is taking some time to process the
>> data after it receives it before doing anything.
>>
>> This is on OSX, but I'm going t
On 20/12/10 17:19, Jon Ribbens wrote:
Could it be SO_REUSEADDR?
Um... no ;-)
It did seem unlikely ;)
--
Telephone: +44 1904 567330, Mobile: +44 7879 423002
Switchboard: +44 1904 567349, Fax: +44 20 79006980
Post: Tower House, Fishergate, York, YO10 4UA, UK
Registered in England. Company No
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 04:26:09PM +, Doug Winter wrote:
> Matt Hamilton wrote:
> > I'm off to go dig in the urllib code and see if I can see anything
> > there. I'm wondering if urllib is taking some time to process the
> > data after it receives it before doing anything.
> >
> > This is on O
Matt Hamilton wrote:
> I'm off to go dig in the urllib code and see if I can see anything
> there. I'm wondering if urllib is taking some time to process the
> data after it receives it before doing anything.
>
> This is on OSX, but I'm going to go try it on a FreeBSD box as I can
> then use ktrac
On 20 Dec 2010, at 14:15, Alex Willmer wrote:
> On 20 December 2010 13:54, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Anyone know why urllib.urlopen() can be so much slower than using ab to do
> the same thing? I seem to be getting an extra 100ms latency on a simple HTTP
> GET request of a static, small image.
>
On 20 Dec 2010, at 13:54, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Ok, here's a non job related post...
>
> Anyone know why urllib.urlopen() can be so much slower than using ab to do
> the same thing? I seem to be getting an extra 100ms latency on a simple HTTP
> GET request of a static, small image.
Some mor
On 20 December 2010 13:54, Matt Hamilton wrote:
> Anyone know why urllib.urlopen() can be so much slower than using ab to do
> the same thing? I seem to be getting an extra 100ms latency on a simple HTTP
> GET request of a static, small image.
>
Just some possibles:
- How many DNS lookups is ea
On 20 Dec 2010, at 14:04, Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
> 2010/12/20 Matt Hamilton :
>> Ok, here's a non job related post...
>>
>> Anyone know why urllib.urlopen() can be so much slower than using ab to do
>> the same thing? I seem to be getting an extra 100ms latency on a simple HTTP
>> GET request of
2010/12/20 Matt Hamilton :
> Ok, here's a non job related post...
>
> Anyone know why urllib.urlopen() can be so much slower than using ab to do
> the same thing? I seem to be getting an extra 100ms latency on a simple HTTP
> GET request of a static, small image.
> I've tried it repeatedly and ge
Ok, here's a non job related post...
Anyone know why urllib.urlopen() can be so much slower than using ab to do the
same thing? I seem to be getting an extra 100ms latency on a simple HTTP GET
request of a static, small image.
e.g.
>>> for x in range(10):
... t1 = time(); data = urlopen('htt
13 matches
Mail list logo
