Re: [python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-03 Thread Steve - Gadget Barnes
On 03/09/2016 18:19, Andy Robinson wrote: > Steve, thanks for this. > > For the use case I have in mind - running club web site, all info public > - typically 3-5 people in a club would use the GitHub raw web UI to > create a new markdown file, hit commit and it's live. No branches or > pull req

Re: [python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-03 Thread Andy Robinson
Steve, thanks for this. For the use case I have in mind - running club web site, all info public - typically 3-5 people in a club would use the GitHub raw web UI to create a new markdown file, hit commit and it's live. No branches or pull requests ever. A handful of others would have set up the C

Re: [python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-02 Thread Stestagg
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 7:57 PM Andy Robinson wrote: > Re-subjecting... > > On 2 September 2016 at 19:30, Stestagg wrote: > > Hi Andy > > > > We use travis to build the site. You can see the travis yaml file and > build > > scripts in our repo: > ... > > If you can make your repo public, I would

Re: [python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-02 Thread Alistair Broomhead
I've used slack, as well as a few other messaging clients. I'd say that unless you have any specific requirements it's the best I've used, the integrations are fairly intuitive to set up, although i recommend separate notification rooms rather than having everything spewed into rooms where you migh

Re: [python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-02 Thread Pepper R.
Sent from my iPhone On 2 Sep 2016, at 20:18, Alistair Broomhead mailto:alistair.broomh...@gmail.com>> wrote: It's also worth looking at circleci and buildbot, where the latter is run locally, which has its own pros and cons, and the former has had a lot of hype because of support for paralle

Re: [python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-02 Thread Andy Robinson
On 2 September 2016 at 20:18, Alistair Broomhead wrote: > It's also worth looking at circleci and buildbot, where the latter is run > locally, which has its own pros and cons, and the former has had a lot of > hype because of support for parallelism. Travis has good integration with > slack though

Re: [python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-02 Thread Alistair Broomhead
It's also worth looking at circleci and buildbot, where the latter is run locally, which has its own pros and cons, and the former has had a lot of hype because of support for parallelism. Travis has good integration with slack though which is cool, and it has a lot of community support. On Fri, 2

[python-uk] Static site generators with Python

2016-09-02 Thread Andy Robinson
Re-subjecting... On 2 September 2016 at 19:30, Stestagg wrote: > Hi Andy > > We use travis to build the site. You can see the travis yaml file and build > scripts in our repo: ... > If you can make your repo public, I would recommend travis as a great way to > build your site. We can > If you've