On 19/03/2012 22:15, David Neil wrote:
On 20/03/12 03:16, James Broadhead wrote:
On 19 March 2012 14:08, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
On 19/03/2012 13:17, James Broadhead wrote:
Perhaps a "no interactive demos" rule would be good, as these always
take more time than you'd imagine.
But I *like*
>
>
> I quite liked the semi-interactive (pseudo-interactive?) presentation
> shell from last time's default argument talk, in that it managed to
> replace slides with alternating printed code examples and running code
> (without the presenter touching the keyboard). {Was a link to that
> shared ar
On 20/03/12 03:16, James Broadhead wrote:
On 19 March 2012 14:08, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
On 19/03/2012 13:17, James Broadhead wrote:
Perhaps a "no interactive demos" rule would be good, as these always
take more time than you'd imagine.
But I *like* interactive / live-coding demos! I'd rat
On 19 March 2012 14:08, Jonathan Hartley wrote:
> On 19/03/2012 13:17, James Broadhead wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps a "no interactive demos" rule would be good, as these always
>> take more time than you'd imagine.
>
> But I *like* interactive / live-coding demos! I'd rather make sure the
> speakers know
On 19/03/2012 13:17, James Broadhead wrote:
On 19 March 2012 12:43, Nicholas H.Tollervey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Last week the London Python Code Dojo cat-herders were discussing the
possibility of making the lightning talks a permanent feature with the
follow
+1 on the idea in general
Another colour for the timer bikeshed:
http://osjam.appspot.com/timer?
--
Love regards etc
David Miller
http://www.deadpansincerity.com
07854 880 883
___
python-uk mailing list
python-uk@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mail
On 19 March 2012 13:20, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 19/03/2012 13:17, James Broadhead wrote:
>>
>> Definitely a good idea - provided that there's an obvious timer
>> available to the presenter.
>
> In the past, someone with a smartphone and a silly noise has
> played this role. Presumably someone could
On Mar 19, 2012, at 1:17 PM, James Broadhead wrote:
> On 19 March 2012 12:43, Nicholas H.Tollervey wrote:
>>
>> Last week the London Python Code Dojo cat-herders were discussing the
>> possibility of making the lightning talks a permanent feature with the
>> following considerations:
>>
>> * Ta
On 19/03/2012 13:17, James Broadhead wrote:
Definitely a good idea - provided that there's an obvious timer
available to the presenter.
In the past, someone with a smartphone and a silly noise has
played this role. Presumably someone could do this. (My phone
won't unless I count to 300 slowly a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/03/12 13:17, James Broadhead wrote:
> Definitely a good idea - provided that there's an obvious timer
> available to the presenter.
Absolutely, with appropriate warning placards for the cat-herder to
wave at the appropriate moments in time. If
On 19 March 2012 12:43, Nicholas H.Tollervey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> Last week the London Python Code Dojo cat-herders were discussing the
> possibility of making the lightning talks a permanent feature with the
> following considerations:
>
> * Talks *
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Last week the London Python Code Dojo cat-herders were discussing the
possibility of making the lightning talks a permanent feature with the
following considerations:
* Talks *strictly* limited to 5mins with an additional 2mins for
questions.
* N
12 matches
Mail list logo
