I'm happy to provide informal advise on trial design
Power calculations are the starting point for proper RCTs...
Michael Grazebrook wrote:
>It would be amusing to do a randomised trial, well-designed, and submit
>the results to some prestigious journal.
>
>Of course we'd probably be turned dow
It would be amusing to do a randomised trial, well-designed, and submit
the results to some prestigious journal.
Of course we'd probably be turned down. But then again, I bet there are
very few academic studies based on the use of hardened professionals
like us.
Or even ... we could look for pape
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
This sounds like the most awesomested idea for a dojo evar. :-)
And yes, I agree with you in your original post that a vacuum is a bad
thing. Like anything worth doing I suppose it's a balancing act so
people don't feel coerced into methodo
People are always banging on about how programming lacks scientific
rigour when it comes to evaluating common practice.
Is TDD *always* faster?
http://blog.8thlight.com/uncle-bob/2012/01/11/Flipping-the-Bit.html
Is it *ever* faster?
http://www.davewsmith.com/blog/2009/proof-that-tdd-slows-proje
