On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 at 12:33 Daniele Procida wrote:
> So, you are literally saying that the only way to get by here is by being
> a man.
>
> I see Sophie's problem all too clearly.
*blink*[0]
Words escape me to explain quite how moronic that statement is. Let me
rephrase for your benefit[1]:
F
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 at 10:56 Cory Benfield (Lukasa)
wrote:
For future reference, I did criticise the work... and was then accused of
being rude about my personal summary dismissal of the quality of the
recruiter based on the evidence available.
Furthermore a CoC is not the way forward. CoC's val
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 at 04:19 Daniele Procida wrote:
> It wasn't spam. We have discussed several times whether recruitment
> messages are welcome here. To date, we've not come to any consensus that
> they are not.
>
Ok, lets take the position it wasn't spam. If you received the OPs email,
directly
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016 at 14:59 Steve Holden wrote:
> +1
>
> A little innocent fun is OK, but when it runs the risk of being hurtful
> it's probably gone far enough. It would be horrible if the Python community
> got a name for being snide.
>
+1
While I didn't post, I considered making something o
