Re: [python-uk] The London Python Dojo is this Thursday

2013-07-15 Thread E Hartley
:) E Hartley ed.hart...@gmail.com On 15 Jul 2013, at 15:09, Jonathan Hartley wrote: > Whereas my buffoon status is very much still active. > > > On 15/07/13 14:41, E Hartley wrote: >> Speaking as a recovering PM excluding blustering buffoons as team leaders >> ta

Re: [python-uk] The London Python Dojo is this Thursday

2013-07-15 Thread E Hartley
Speaking as a recovering PM excluding blustering buffoons as team leaders takes it so far out of the realm of real life as to be almost like coding Nirvana. E On 15 Jul 2013, at 12:59, Jonathan Hartley wrote: > blustering buffoons ___ python-uk maili

Re: [python-uk] Suggestions / best practices for deployment

2013-05-15 Thread E Hartley
this and had a series of package breakages as the library dependencies broke. HTH Ed E Hartley ed.hart...@gmail.com On 15 May 2013, at 10:57, Harry Percival wrote: > Dear UK Python chums, > > some of you probably know I'm writing a book about TDD for O'Reilly. I&#x

Re: [python-uk] British Library hack event May 28-29

2013-05-09 Thread E Hartley
Hi, I'd very much like to attend this as I've a long standing interest in media archiving and meta-data from my involvement in MPEG and standardisation. However circumstances may preclude me attending, so in any case I've forwarded the message to the BSI reflector concerned with MPEG and media m

Re: [python-uk] Python Trademark at Risk in Europe

2013-02-16 Thread E Hartley
To my knowledge the Python programming language was actively used as a teaching language in the UK academic community at least as early as 1994. Ed Hartley On 15 Feb 2013, at 00:03, Chris Withers wrote: > On 14/02/2013 20:29, Tim Golden wrote: >> For those who don't follow other channels. >> >

Re: [python-uk] The perils of reply-to

2013-01-03 Thread E Hartley
On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:13, Michael Foord wrote: > > On 3 Jan 2013, at 17:07, Jon Ribbens wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 04:41:27PM +, Antonio Cavallo wrote: >>> like this? >>> >>> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=50e5b456e4b04de5024a >> >> I don't want either of those options