On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:13:07AM +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> > I guess it goes without saying, but just in case, the core team gave up
> > on any possibility of in-process sandboxing a very long time ago, and
> > all popular implementations are designed with pretty much zero regard
> > for this
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:19:06PM +, David Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 06:17:29PM +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> > Further to the success of dojo participants in breaking out of my
> > sandbox experiment due to a stupid bug I'd created, I've both
> > tightened up the sandbox and exten
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 06:17:29PM +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> Further to the success of dojo participants in breaking out of my
> sandbox experiment due to a stupid bug I'd created, I've both
> tightened up the sandbox and extended it by adding back in 'with'
> and 'import' (of white-listed module
Further to the success of dojo participants in breaking out of my
sandbox experiment due to a stupid bug I'd created, I've both
tightened up the sandbox and extended it by adding back in 'with'
and 'import' (of white-listed modules).
If anyone would like to have another go at breaking out of it,
I
