On 17 December 2010 08:56, Ross Lawley wrote:
> Personally, I would have scanned and then ignored the message had it not had
> 31 replies!!
The irony further underlined by you adding another (and then me too!).
Merry Christmas to all UK Pythonistas!
__
Personally, I would have scanned and then ignored the message had it not had
31 replies!!
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Zeth wrote:
> On 13 December 2010 16:31, Alec Battles wrote:
> >
> > Am I the only one who considers this a bit spammy?
>
> No I also consider it more spam than ham when it
On 13 December 2010 16:31, Alec Battles wrote:
>
> Am I the only one who considers this a bit spammy?
No I also consider it more spam than ham when it is a vague advert
rather than details for a real job. If it doesn't have real details
(precise location, industry, salary in pounds, etc) then it
