> You sound like the sort of person who should be using the one I wrote,
> http://jonpy.sf.net/ ;-) It's designed to be lightweight and easy to
> use as well as powerful (it's very simple, nothing like the complexity
> of Zope etc).
>
> Just a quick plug ;-)
LOL - you should be on Parkinson with
Simon Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://adju.st/entry/sucky-web-frameworks-redux
>
> I feel like the guy on the Fast Show picking his football team!
>
> Everytime I decide to go with a certain framework someone else makes a
> good case for a different one and after I faff around for
Doug,
I've read your blog and your replies here with great interest.
The points you make about understanding and progress are very interesting.
No wonder [some] people think Zope sucks because Acquisition is so
difficult to grok; but now after having understood its power I feel
this is one of Zope
> http://adju.st/entry/sucky-web-frameworks-redux
I feel like the guy on the Fast Show picking his football team!
Everytime I decide to go with a certain framework someone else makes a
good case for a different one and after I faff around for weeks I end up
writing it in 2 days in naked Python
Simon Faulkner wrote:
>>RoR and TG share the explict MVC model as a one-size-fits-all approach
>>to web development, which may or may not be a bad thing depending on
>>your application I guess. TG does seem to provide everything you need
>>to write a complex web application, and it does provide
