Probably just qwt.
IIRC last time I updated python-qt4, qwt didn't like it either. I
believe qwt does a runtime check and aborts as you describe if the
version doesn't match what it was compiled again.
I don't think this is actually a python-qt4 bug, but a feature of qwt.
I will be travelin
It's being addressed. See #647210.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On 11/08/2011 04:48 PM, Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
...
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647695
It seems to me that there is an incompatibility between
python-qt4 (4.8.3-4, 4.8.6-2) and libqtwebkit 2.1.0~2011week09-3
And that the right dependency of python-qt4 should be at lea
I can confirm the bug, but it's a byproduct of the new sip4. Downgrading to
the sip4 in Testing produces a successful build.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailm
Upstream says this Sip4 version only works with PyQt4 4.9, so I'll leave this
RC bug open against Sip4 to keep the new version out of Testing until we can
get PyQt4 (python-qt4) updated.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
I believe I see what my mistake was.
Thanks,
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
Already fixed. Your PPA is out of date. If you have problems with an Ubuntu
PPA, please deal with the PPA owner and not the Debian BTS.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cg
On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 08:22:35 PM Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that there are quite a few python modules (pyglew, daap,
> pyxine, pycg, dhm, etc.) that are currently under maintenance by this
> team on the orphaned package list:
> http://qa.debian.org/orphaned.html
>
> I was
Did you get the patch directly from upstream or is it in their latest
snapshot?
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.al
The relevant packages have been rebuilt several times since this bug was filed
and I can't reproduce the error in either python2.6, 2.7, or 3.2. I believe
it's resolved.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.or
On Saturday, February 18, 2012 09:39:55 AM Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
> Please, when renaming packages don't forget to add conflict with older
> name. I am not the first time stumbling upon 'trying to overwrite ...
> which is also in package' error with python packages. That were on
> upgrades from 2.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
I think that such a method would be fragile. I don't think a solution that
requires maintainers to manually review code from new upstream releases to
adjust dependencies is adequate. To do such a thing we'd need a tools to
search the code and generate proper dependencies. I didn't think much
19:24:03.0 -0500
+++ storm-0.19/debian/changelog 2012-03-20 09:54:11.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+storm (0.19-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fixed watch file to work with Launchpad again
+
+ -- Scott Kitterman Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:53:49 -0400
+
storm (0.19-1) unstable; urgency=low
Sent to the PyQt development list.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules
This should be fixed as of tonight's upstream snapshot and will be in the next
python-qt4 release.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http:
Please provide the exact steps you used to run this demo so I can try to
reproduce the problem.
Thanks,
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.d
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 01:41:41 PM Yann Dirson wrote:
...
> Looking at /usr/share/doc/python-qt4-doc/examples/README, no exact
> command to run the examples is given, but the hint about
> examples/demos/qtdemo led me to launch:
>
> /usr/share/doc/python-qt4-doc/examples/demos/qtdemo/qtdemo.py
The examples are meant to be run from examples/demos/qtdemo/qtdemo.py. It's
not been ported to python3 yet, so there's not a good way to do this as
provided from upstream.
If I run graphicsview/anchorlayout.py with python2.7 I also get a segmentation
fault, so there is something worth looking
Since the problem is triggered by the Qt version changing, it's not clear to
me how to catch this automatically. I'll see what I can do about this case.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.a
Queued binnmus for qscintilla2 which should deal with this.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
I believe this will be fixed by the qscintilla2 binNMU I had done today.
Please check if you still have this problem after updating it.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cg
On Saturday, May 05, 2012 11:07:29 AM PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
...
> so a binNMU of pyqwt5 should be enought
...
Scheduled. Please let me know in the bug if that solves it for you.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
If you could provide a reduced test case I can use to replicate this and
report it upstream, I'll work with them to see what we can do.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi
Can you rebuild calibre and see if that fixes it?
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Please provide a minimal test case I can use to confirm the bug and discuss it
with upstream.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lis
On Thursday, May 10, 2012 05:28:56 AM B.Cordier wrote:
> I've attached a simple .ui file, you just need to run :
>
> pyuic4 test.ui -o test.py
>
> It should return a segfault.
No segfault here on i386. Are you on amd64?
Scott K
___
Python-modules-
This will probably be fixed by a pykde4 rebuild, but first akonadi, kde4libs
and
kdepimlibs need to be rebuilt. This is in progress today.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.or
On Friday, May 11, 2012 02:58:35 AM B.Cordier wrote:
> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PyKDE4/kdeui.so
PyKDE4 is known to be broken at the moment. It needs to be rebuilt after
akonadi, kde4libs, and kdepimlibs (which are in progress). Once that's done,
then we'll see if there's still a proble
Please test again 4.13.2-1+b1 after it is built.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
PyKDE is reported to be working now, so please retry and see if the problem
still appears.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.
For Python, we have python-qt4-gl. It depends on python-opengl. Python-
opengl is not ported to Python 3 yet, so there's no way to support
PyQt4/QtOpenGL yet.
We'll support it when the dependencies are available (python3-opengl) and it's
part of what upstream ships. I imagine it'll be support
The dependency relationship predates my work on the package, so I've assumed
it's correct. Perhaps it was a some point and it's not now. Next time I
update the package, I can see if I can build this module for Python 3.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
Just for the record, reported upstream with patch. See
http://pyyaml.org/ticket/247
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lis
The Avogadro dependency is incorrect and should be fixed. Depends: python2.7,
python-qt4 will do what you want. Since, if Avogadro needs 2.7, you need to
depend on it directly, also depending on python2.7-qt4 is redundant.
Scott K
P.S. Due to a multi-day power outage all I've got to work from is
That's a bug in the policy I failed to notice. It should be restricted to
packages that build modules only for the non-default version of Python which
Avogadro doesn't. One or the other package needs to be changed. I agree with
that.
python-avogadro is the only package in the archive that de
On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 10:19:34 PM Daniel Leidert wrote:
...
> If the policy is not correct, it should be fixed after Wheezy release.
> I'd appreciate a pointer from your site, when you start the discussion.
...
After the Wheezy release having the provides will be entirely superfluous since
t
I can. Thanks for the second opinion.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
sip4 will cause you the same problem. I'll take care of that too.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Thursday, July 05, 2012 07:59:19 AM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> sip4 will cause you the same problem. I'll take care of that too.
Actually that's wrong. Sip4 is fine.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alio
I have a patch from upstream that I'm testing.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Uploading directly since this is over a week with no response from the
maintainer. NMU diff is identical to the last patch attached except for
unstable/UNRELEASED.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-module
That was meant to go to a different bug.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-m
Looks like a dh_python3 bug that mistakenly rewrote that shebang.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Saturday, July 28, 2012 06:00:19 PM Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> my guess is that it needs overrides for dh_python* calls like I did
> recently for cython:
>
> override_dh_python2:
> dh_python2 -pcython
>
> override_dh_python3:
> dh_python3 -pcython3
>
Yes. Something like that should
>From upstream:
> Almost certainly a user error/Qt "feature". Try creating a QApplication
> instance first.
Please try this and report back if you are still having a problem.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.
evall
python-qt4 (U)
Michael Meskes
pykde4 (U)
Miriam Ruiz
calibre
Modestas Vainius
pykde4 (U)
Python Applications Packaging Team
veusz
Scott Kitterman
python-qt4 (U)
qscintilla2 (U)
Sune Vuorela
pykde4 (U)
Torsten Marek
python-qt4 (U)
qscintilla2
Waiting on the release team to approve a sip4 transition (#707239).
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 12:16:19 PM Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Hi Scott!
>
> What do you mean by "non-free content"?
The reporter specified the bug report was covered by non-free license.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.
On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:30:06 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 03:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > On 2013-05-21 09:59, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> * Scott Kitterman , 2013-05-21, 06:20:
> >>>> What do you mean by "non-free content"?
> >&g
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:57:45 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 05/21/2013 10:23 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 21, 2013 03:30:06 PM Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> >> For clarity: the original poster of #709138 asked no such thing; the
> >> poster
hppa is no longer an official Debian architecture, si this is not an RC bug.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
It was introduced in 3.2.3-8.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515634
With python-yaml 3.09-1 I am unable to reproduce this problem. I'm not sure
if I have set up the test case correctly. Can you still reproduce this error?
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
"RS Chakravarti" wrote:
>Dear maintainers,
>
>
>
>Sagemath depends on python-processing
>
>which is in Lenny (i386)
>
>but not in Squeeze or Sid.
>
>
>
>Also, it depends on python-2.5
>
>but not on 2.6.
>
>
>
>Upgrading python removes sagemath.
>
>
>
>If possible please fix these problems.
>
Wh
I can't reproduce this either. A quick survey of Google results seems to
indicate this can be a sign of a corrupted .pyc file. I'd recommend removing
the .pyc files in /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/yaml and then try again.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Rebuilding with the current dh_python3 will fix this, but there's no point in
binNMU since a sourceful upload is needed to fix 591957.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modul
Now that clamav is maintaining API/ABI stability, this should be much more
maintainable through the full release cycle.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.a
On Monday, November 29, 2010 09:42:55 am Daniel Holbach wrote:
> On 29.11.2010 15:17, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >> * Rebuild with Python2.7.
> >
> > In Debian we would have scheduled a binNMU and get done with it, so
> > there's nothing in the package to be done.
>
> In Ubuntu we don't have binNMUs.
Squeeze is frozen and won't be updated before release. I do aim to have
Python 3 support available for PyQt in Unstable soon after it releases.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Py
I can't actually test this in Debian due to this bug, but it looks like once
it's fixed there's a python2.7 compatibility issue that will need to be
addressed (fortunately with patch):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pyopenssl/+bug/686804
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 09:55:15 AM Sandro Tosi wrote:
...
> probably numpy was not rebuilt to support python 2.7 yet.
...
It was:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/python-numpy
Scott K
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.ali
On Thursday, May 26, 2011 09:07:23 AM Thomas Goirand wrote:
> This doesn't work like this in Debian: I do not own
> the pyopenssl package, so I need to wait until the
> pkg-python-modules team does it. I can send a patch
> against the package, and if it takes more than a
> week or 2 without an uplo
There's a new version of qscintilla2 that I hadn't packaged yet (waiting for
the python-dbus transition to finish) that properly bumps the soname/version to
6.1.0. I'll rebuild the packages that build-depend on libqscintilla2-dev. It
looks like the relevant pacakges are:
monkeystudio ovito ju
I rebuilt monkeystudio ovito juffed serna-free tora universalindentgui smokeqt
(skipping salome as previously mentioned) with the newest qscintilla2 from
upstream.
serna-free FTBFS for other reasons and is RC buggy (55) so I won't
consider it further.
ovito juffed tora universalindentgui s
kscope FTBFS due to 631779, but gets to that stage with the new qscintilla2,
so is probably fine.
smokekde builds fine.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
Would you please check and see if 4.12.4 I just uploaded to Unstable works any
better for you.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
Should have this fixed today.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Fixed sip is uploaded. This will take some other package updates/rebuilds
before it's resolved, however. No need to file more bugs.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 05:04:50 PM Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Fixed sip is uploaded. This will take some other package updates/rebuilds
> before it's resolved, however. No need to file more bugs.
Rebuilds are done for the more popular architectures. For some of the slower
ones it&
Maintainer request - package is misbuilt due to a dh_python3 bug.
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
___
Python-modules-team maili
On Sunday, August 04, 2013 17:31:30 you wrote:
> Package: python-qt4
> Version: 4.10.2-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the
> past)
FTBFS on ports isn't a serious bug. The problem is that python and python3
are behind on hppa, not a bug
On Monday, August 05, 2013 19:14:33 John David Anglin wrote:
> On 4-Aug-13, at 8:04 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > FTBFS on ports isn't a serious bug. The problem is that python and
> > python3
> > are behind on hppa, not a bug in this package.
>
> Updatin
On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 14:35:18 you wrote:
> The kFreeBSD python3-numpy packages somehow lack .so files, making
> them unusable and causing matplotlib to FTBFS:
Also pandas, pyfits, and python-scipy.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
__
On Friday, August 09, 2013 10:26:05 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 06, 2013 14:35:18 you wrote:
> > The kFreeBSD python3-numpy packages somehow lack .so files, making
> > them unusable and causing matplotlib to FTBFS:
> Also pandas, pyfits, and python-scipy.
On Thursday, August 15, 2013 08:27:33 you wrote:
> Package: python3-astropy-legacy,python3-pyfits
> Version: python3-astropy-legacy/0.2.4-2
> Version: python3-pyfits/1:3.1.2-1+b1
> Severity: serious
> User: trei...@debian.org
> Usertags: edos-file-overwrite.
> ..
> Here is a list of files that are
Sorry about that - I sent the done to the wrong bug.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 15:13:39 Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Aaron M. Ucko" writes:
> > The kFreeBSD python3-numpy packages somehow lack .so files, making
>
> > them unusable and causing matplotlib to FTBFS:
> As this came up on #-mentors just now:
>
> I suspect the problem is the fo
On Saturday, August 31, 2013 16:25:16 Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> Dear Debian Python Modules Team,
>
> Could you please have python-qt4 recompiled for Debian6-Squeeze including
> this patch to fix bug #697348.
Are you sure that's right? That code in the Wheezy version of python-qt4 is:
On Saturday, August 31, 2013 21:36:29 Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 10:47:18 -0400
>
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Saturday, August 31, 2013 16:25:16 Jerome Kieffer wrote:
> > > Dear Debian Python Modules Team,
> > >
> > > Could you ple
In the maintainer's opinion due to breaking other applications.
Scott K
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/c
The fix has been approved by the release team, so I've uploaded it. It will be
available once they've accept it.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/py
Julien Danjou wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 01 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>> Could you please maintain this package using Git? It'd be nice, since
>> that's an OpenStack stuff, and that everything there is maintained
>using
>> Git. If there is still resistance in the Python Module team, then you
>> can
If this is still a problem, it's pykde4 needing to be rebuilt with the new
sip.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On January 31, 2014 6:42:51 AM EST, Thorsten Alteholz
wrote:
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>there are two lintian errors in your new examples-package:
>
> lintian check for pyqt5-examples_5.2+dfsg-2_all.deb
>E: pyqt5-examples: changelog-file-not-compressed changelog
>E: pyqt5-examples: changelog
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 16:43:22 Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Switching to --user by default is being actively discussed upstream:
>
> https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/1668
>
> In the meantime, I plan on updating the manpage to describe --user and any
> other missing options.
Can you go ahead and m
Source: pyzmq
Version: 14.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
The current pymzq upload FTBFS on the mentioned architectures. The mips*
failures are different than the kfreebsd* failures. This package is part
of the transition to
Source: python-tornado
Version: 3.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
While rebuilding your package on mips as part of the python3.3 removal
transition, the following test failure (and FTBFS) ocurred:
# python3 tests only in autop
On Friday, June 13, 2014 21:47:55 Torsten Paul wrote:
> Package: libqt5scintilla2-dev
> Version: 2.8.1-4
> Severity: important
>
> The features file is installed in
> /usr/share/qt5/mkspecs/features/qscintilla2.prf but qmake seems to only
> read from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/features.
Yes. It's fine to keep them all in one bug. Translations aren't architecture
specific so I'd guess the current location for the Qt5 translation is fine
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.
On Tuesday, June 17, 2014 19:02:32 Torsten Paul wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It looks like that affects also the header files. Using the installed
> Qt/qmake, they are searched in /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5 but the
> dev package installs the Qsci headers in /usr/include/qt5.
>
> Using "QMAKEFEATURES=/
Excellent. Thanks for both the detailed report and testing.
Scott K
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
On Friday, June 20, 2014 16:55:29 Julian Taylor wrote:
> in svn I have disabled all performance relevant tests which includes
> this one. Upstream has a convinient switch for that for the CI. its
> currently waiting for sponsoring.
Looking at it.
Scott K
_
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:34:05 +0100 "Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi all,
>I'd like to report here my feelings about the current way to maintain
>package in our repositories (DPMT and PAPT).
>
>As of now, policy[1] states that:
>
> Thus if you bring some packages into the team, you can
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:17:29 +0200 "Sandro Tosi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Dear HPPA admin,
>
>> I'd like to know what is the situation about PyOpenSSL compilation on
>> hppa port machine. The package version 0.6-5 was uploaded on
>> 2008-03-08 and, as of now, no build attempt was made on hppa
Python-dns is used by python-spf and python-formencode.
I wanted to let you know that python-dns has problems with respect to the
current DNS cache issue. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=490217 for details.
Python-dns upstream is going to do a release that will at least pr
Python-dns is used by python-spf and python-formencode.
I wanted to let you know that python-dns has problems with respect to the
current DNS cache issue. See
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=490217 for details.
Python-dns upstream has now agreed to provide both TID randomizati
Please don't assign bugs to Debian teams such as DPMT.
** Changed in: python-xml (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Debian Python Modules Team (python-modules-team) => (unassigned)
--
Cannot install; depends on python 2.6 or less but 2.6.1 is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335914
You received th
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:04:45 + Jonathan Wiltshire
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>python-yaml seems to be a priority: extra package, and I have a
>package dependent on it which is priority: optional. Before I change the
>priority, is there any reason python-yaml can't become optional instead?
>
>(please keep
On Monday 23 March 2009 13:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is
> > extra. If you get libyaml moved to optional, I've no problem moving
&g
1 - 100 of 216 matches
Mail list logo
