On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> Source: python-scrapy
> Version: 0.14.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: wheezy sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120624 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, y
forwarded 573369 http://dev.scrapy.org/ticket/158
thanks
Hello Miernik,
Sorry for the delay replying to your bug report.
I have forwarded this bug upstream [1]. I will keep you posted.
Thank you very much for taking the time to write such a complete bug report. :)
Cheers,
Ignace M
[1] http:/
tags 573369 + patch pending
thanks
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 05:19, Daniel Graña wrote:
> already fixed, see http://dev.scrapy.org/ticket/145
Thank you for your prompt reaction!
I hadn't seen that this bug had been already forwarded upstream.
I will prepare a new release applying upstream's patc
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:16, Michael Fladischer wrote:
>
> /usr/share/doc/python-scrapy-doc/html/objects.inv.gz should not get
> compressed to be of use for sphinx.ext.intersphinx.
>
> For an example of a fix see:
> http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/python-modules/packages/sphinx/branches/1.0/debian/
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 22:04, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Source: python-scrapy
> Version: 0.12.0.2528-1
> Severity: important
>
> python is needed to run the clean target, so it should be put in
> Build-Depends, not in Build-Depends-Indep.
My bad. Will do.
Thank you for reporting this issue.
Cheers,
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 22:05, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> python-scrapy build-depends on python-jinja, but (as far as I can tell) this
> package is not used at build time.
Hi Jakub,
Sorry for the delay of my response; I was AFK for the past two weeks.
As per the scrapy documentation [1], the jinja P
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 04:41, Janos Guljas wrote:
> Package: python-scrapy
> Version: 0.12.0.2538-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> A lot of bugs has been fixed in this new release. Could you package it?
Hi,
Thank you for reporting this.
I will work on packaging it asap.
Cheers,
Ignace M
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 14:53, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> Because of "2.5-2.6" in debian/pyversions, this package will become
> uninstallable once we switch default Python version to 2.7.
Hi Jakub,
Thanks for reporting this.
python-scrapy is indeed compatible with python 2.7 [1]. I will correct
this
Hello Julian,
Thank you for reporting this issue and providing the patch to correct it.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 11:41, Julian Taylor
wrote:
> The patch applied upstream in
> https://github.com/insophia/scrapy/commit/3191a0856003e8298d9d4b74aec56ffb5ed38432
> is not correct.
> I forwarded this pat
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 22:02, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
> I will be uploading a new release of the package including your patch.
>
> Also, it looks like your patch has been applied upstream [1].
An new version has been released upstream including your patch [2].
I am currently w
10 matches
Mail list logo
