On 04/08/2013 12:17 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Daniel Kahn Gillmor , 2013-04-06, 15:05:
>>> Insisting that all binary packages should have ${python:Depends} will
>>> cause tons of false positives; let's not go that way.
>>>
>>> I think Lintian should emit the tag only if none of the binary
>>> packa
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor , 2013-04-06, 15:05:
Insisting that all binary packages should have ${python:Depends} will
cause tons of false positives; let's not go that way.
I think Lintian should emit the tag only if none of the binary
packages have ${python:Depends}. This is not bulletproof, but sh
On 04/06/2013 02:30 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Insisting that all binary packages should have ${python:Depends} will
> cause tons of false positives; let's not go that way.
>
> I think Lintian should emit the tag only if none of the binary packages
> have ${python:Depends}. This is not bulletproof, b
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor , 2013-04-05, 11:20:
Lintian has already this:
http://lintian.debian.org/tags/python-depends-but-no-python-helper.html
Implementing the reverse, i.e. python-helper-but-no-python-depends,
should be very straight-forward and give good results.
how should the reverse test de
On 04/05/2013 11:07 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Lintian has already this:
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/python-depends-but-no-python-helper.html
> Implementing the reverse, i.e. python-helper-but-no-python-depends,
> should be very straight-forward and give good results.
how should the reverse tes
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor , 2013-04-02, 14:53:
This seems like a packaging bug that is a reasonable candidate for a
lintian check. I'm happy to submit such a wishlist bug to lintian.
Can you help me characterize the problem?
Would it be a reasonable test to say that the following test is an
indi
On 04/02/2013 12:49 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> ${python:Depends} is missing from your Depends line. This is a serious bug.
the built package has the minimum python dependencies already, but
you're right that it doesn't include the maximum deps (e.g. Depends:
doesn't say python (<< 2.8) ).
This seem
FYI, debian-python@lists.d.o is usually a better place to look for a
sponsor.
* Simon Fondrie-Teitler , 2013-04-01, 15:52:
In anticipation of mediagoblin needing itsdangerous starting with the
next release, I've created a package for itsdangerous. I've uploaded it
here: https://mentors.debian.
Hi Simon--
On 04/01/2013 04:52 PM, Simon Fondrie-Teitler wrote:
> In anticipation of mediagoblin needing itsdangerous starting with the
> next release, I've created a package for itsdangerous. I've uploaded it
> here: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-itsdangerous
This packaging looks ve
Hi,
In anticipation of mediagoblin needing itsdangerous starting with the
next release, I've created a package for itsdangerous. I've uploaded it
here: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python-itsdangerous
The ITP, with a summary of the package, is here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
10 matches
Mail list logo
