Package: python3-django-markupfield
Severity: serious
Version: 1.2.1-2+deb8u1
Hello,
database migrations generated when using markupfields with
python3-django-markupfield 1.2.1 do not work with stable's django
version 1.7.x.
https://github.com/jamesturk/django-markupfield/issues/20
This ma
-1.3+dfsg.1/debian/changelog 2014-11-10 22:18:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+python-babel (1.3+dfsg.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Call test suite with LC_ALL=C to avoid test failures. Closes: #741834
+
+ -- Thomas Viehmann Mon, 11 Nov 2014 11:11:11 +0100
te integer).
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
umeric
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/PIL
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5
/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/gtk-2.0
/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/wx-2.6-gtk2-unicode
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Pyth
thing.
Thanks!
Kind regards
T.
P.S.: I think that technically 'grave' implicitly includes 'useless for
everyone', so this should be 'important', but seeing this resolved is
more interesting than setting the severity.
--
Hi,
I thought this was not supposed to happen for messages forwarded by the BTS?
Kind regards
T.
Original Message
Subject: Your message to Python-modules-team awaits moderator approval
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:49:21 +
From: python-modules-team-boun...@lists.alioth.debian.
n well-established alternatives like
PIL exist.
The way the python boost detection failure was handled upstream or the
arbitrary increasing of the minimal python version is also not exactly
confidence-inspiring.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
pythonmagick_0.9
og
+++ pyusb-0.4.1/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+pyusb (0.4.1-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Don't pass int* where we need Py_ssize_t*.
+Breaks (overwriting parameters) for python 2.5 on 64 bit arch.
+Needs the usual PEP353 compatibility bruhaha plus
Hi Stephan,
unfortunately, the copyright and license documentation in
debian/copyright is lacking, e.g. figleaf is missing
completely, this makes me reject the package.
While you are at it, you could make it more explicit
(as in "This is from MIT-licensed divmod Epsilon")
where sslverify.py comes
style classes
+(e.g. faultType in python 2.5). Closes: #507266
+
+ -- Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:09:34 +0100
+
python-soappy (0.12.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control:
diff -u python-soappy-0.12.0/debian/patches/00list
python-soappy-0.12.0/debian/pat
regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Hi Cesare,
unfortunately pyelemental's debian/copyright lacks
copyright statements for the docbook stylesheet,
so it cannot be accepted into Debian before fixing
it.
Kind regards
T.
===
If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the
override file requires editing, reply to t
Hi Luciano,
where did you get the 2008 in the copyright notice in
debian/copyright from? All I found was 2006.
Not too grave, but worth fixing.
Kind regards
T.
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://l
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> python-elementtree-doc_1.2.6-12_all.deb: package says section is doc,
>> override says python.
> python-elementtree-doc contains the api documentation, so imho it should
> be section: doc. Please change the override.
Done,
kind regards
T.
--
Tho
r.
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
diff -u ll-xist-2.15.5/debian/changelog ll-xist-2.15.5/debian/changelog
--- ll-xist-2.15.5/debian/changelog
+++ ll-xist-2.15.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ll-xist (2.15.5-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upl
implementation
(python-scipy-0.6.0/scipy/io/netcdf.py) is used, it might be nice to
see whether the netcdfg-dev build-dependency should be revisited.
(CCing debian-python because the bugs will disappear from the
release-goal list.)
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net
16 matches
Mail list logo