binary:python3-line-profiler is NEW.
binary:python3-line-profiler is NEW.
source:python-line-profiler is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are
python-line-profiler_2.0+ds1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-line-profiler_2.0+ds1-1.dsc
python-line-profiler_2.0+ds1.orig.tar.gz
python-line-profiler_2.0+ds1-1.debian.tar.xz
python-line-profiler_2.0+ds1-1_amd64.buildinfo
python3-line-profil
On March 7, 2017 10:42:50 PM EST, Tristan Seligmann
wrote:
>On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 at 02:11 Daniele Tricoli wrote:
soon.
>> Should I need to backport this also for Stretch?
>>
>
>I think it's not critical to backport it; CCing hlieberman for a second
>opinion, since he originally discovered the iss
python-ws4py 0.3.4-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2017-04-07
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
854494: execnet: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.or
django-html-sanitizer 0.1.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-03-27
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named sanitizer
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modu
sorl-thumbnail 12.3+git20160928-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on
2017-04-07
It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
854494: execnet: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.al
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 at 02:11 Daniele Tricoli wrote:
> I will add the >= 1.10.0, on the next upload. I plan to upload
> urllib 1.20 to experimental soon.
>
> Should I need to backport this also for Stretch?
>
I think it's not critical to backport it; CCing hlieberman for a second
opinion, since he
On March 7, 2017 7:11:35 PM EST, Daniele Tricoli wrote:
>Hello Tristan,
>thanks for this report.
>
>On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 5:19:02 AM CET Tristan Seligmann wrote:
>> setup.py does not have a version constraint on six as it is vendored
>> upstream, but since we are unvendoring it in Debian, we
Hello Tristan,
thanks for this report.
On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 5:19:02 AM CET Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> setup.py does not have a version constraint on six as it is vendored
> upstream, but since we are unvendoring it in Debian, we need a version
> constraint. This is made trickier by the fact t
FYI: The status of the python-django source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.10.5-1
Current version: 1:1.10.6-1
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 854701 python-asyncssh: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
Bug #854701 [src:python-asyncssh] python-asyncssh: FTBFS (failing tests)
Changed Bug title to 'python-asyncssh: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)' from
'python-asyncssh: FTBFS (failing t
retitle 854701 python-asyncssh: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
thanks
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 08:52:20PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> are you still able to reproduce this in your environment?
Yes, I can, but the failure happens randomly.
Sorry, I did not know it was random when I initially report
binary:python-terminado is NEW.
binary:python3-terminado is NEW.
binary:python-terminado is NEW.
binary:python3-terminado is NEW.
source:terminado is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had
terminado_0.6-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
terminado_0.6-1~bpo8+1.dsc
terminado_0.6-1~bpo8+1.debian.tar.xz
python-terminado_0.6-1~bpo8+1_all.deb
python3-terminado_0.6-1~bpo8+1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running o
14 matches
Mail list logo
