Hello,
I have already sent a RFS for requests 2.4.3-3 with a fix for this. I already
tried python-docker 0.5.3-1 after building it inside a pbuilder chroot: using
requests 2.4.3-3, python-docker works.
See this thread for details:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2014/11/msg1.html
Spe
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 767826 +patch
Bug #767826 [python3-django-assets] python3-django-assets: fails to install:
SyntaxError: Missing parentheses in call to 'print'
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Hello,
I have noticed this error when installing this package.
Attached is a trivial patch that fixes this bug
Sent upstream: https://github.com/miracle2k/django-assets/pull/47
--
Jason Pleau
Description: python3 compat for pytest_plugin.py
Trivial change to make the print statement compatibl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 769047 + pending
Bug #769047 [src:requests] requests.packages.urllib3 stub must be the same of
global urllib3 package
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
769047: http://bugs.
Package: libapache2-mod-wsgi-py3
Version: 2.0.7-1
Severity: important
provides httpd-wsgi, however httpd-wsgi is for the Python 2 WSGI API.
As the Python 3 WSGI API cannot be used with Python 2 applications, this
will break Python 2 applications that depend on httpd-wsgi.
As libapache2-mod-wsgi
Source: requests
Version: 2.4.3-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
To prevent other bugs like #767445.
Look at the whole thread for a complete explanation:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2014/11/msg1.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
tag 741834 +patch
thank you
Hi,
this is a tiny patch to address the test failures.
Thank you
Thomas
diff -Nru python-babel-1.3+dfsg.1/debian/changelog python-babel-1.3+dfsg.1/debian/changelog
--- python-babel-1.3+dfsg.1/debian/changelog 2014-06-24 09:06:24.0 +0200
+++ python-babel-1.3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 741834 +patch
Bug #741834 [src:python-babel] python-babel: FTBFS: Tests failures
Added tag(s) patch.
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
741834: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=
Sorry my fault.
... Had broken openssl, libssl1.0.0 from experimental. ...
Plus some old python3.3
Please close bug.
Am 10.11.2014 um 19:23 schrieb Dirk Schmidt:
> Hello.
>
> namebench broken.
>
> This is on an fully updated testing installation.
>
> I do not know what is really causing
Hello.
namebench broken.
This is on an fully updated testing installation.
I do not know what is really causing this error,
so i try to post here.
See this:
dirk@box:~$ namebench
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/namebench", line 33, in
from libnamebench import cli
Fi
"AVON" - The New Men and Women's Make-Up
Collection, Avon takes Makeup to a whole new
lever
Quick Browse through the
Hundreds of "NEW AVON PRODUCTS" for Men and Women with a
"NEW" Reference Guide for Makeup, Skin Care,
Fragrances, Body and Bath & Hair
Care
It's so easy, even I can do
it
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768960: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768960,
regarding python-cssutils: Fails to configure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768960: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768960,
regarding python-cssutils: Empty package, upgrade fails during alternative
updates
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768960: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768960,
regarding python-cssutils: alternative path /usr/bin/cssparse_py2 doesn't exist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768950: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768950,
regarding python-cssutils: Empty package, upgrade fails during alternative
updates
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768954: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768954,
regarding python-cssutils: Empty package, upgrade fails during alternative
updates
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768954: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768954,
regarding python-cssutils: Fails to configure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768950: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768950,
regarding python-cssutils: alternative path /usr/bin/cssparse_py2 doesn't exist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768950: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768950,
regarding python-cssutils: Fails to configure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:19:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768954: fixed in cssutils 1.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768954,
regarding python-cssutils: alternative path /usr/bin/cssparse_py2 doesn't exist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:13:11 +0100
Source: cssutils
Binary: python-cssutils python3-cssutils
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-B
cssutils_1.0-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cssutils_1.0-2.dsc
cssutils_1.0-2.debian.tar.xz
python-cssutils_1.0-2_all.deb
python3-cssutils_1.0-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 768950 + pending
Bug #768950 [python-cssutils] python-cssutils: alternative path
/usr/bin/cssparse_py2 doesn't exist
Bug #768954 [python-cssutils] python-cssutils: Empty package, upgrade fails
during alternative updates
Bug #768960 [python-c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 768950 768954 768960
Bug #768950 [python-cssutils] python-cssutils: alternative path
/usr/bin/cssparse_py2 doesn't exist
Bug #768954 [python-cssutils] python-cssutils: Empty package, upgrade fails
during alternative updates
Bug #76896
Package: python-cssutils
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Hello,
today's python-cssutils 1.0-1 fails to install:
| # apt install python-cssutils
| Preparing to unpack .../python-cssutils_1.0-1_all.deb ...
| Unpacking python-cssutils (1.0-1) ...
| E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code
Package: python-cssutils
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
The package does not contain the Python modules nor the scripts. The
missing scripts make the install fails during update-alternative:
update-alternatives: erreur: le chemin alternatif /usr/bin/cs
Package: python-cssutils
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
broken update-alternatives :
Setting up python-cssutils (1.0-1) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/cssparse_py2
doesn't exist
dpkg: error processing package pyt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 768928 0.8.9-1
Bug #768928 {Done: Daniel Pocock } [pynag] writes incorrect
timestamps in Nagios check result files
No longer marked as fixed in versions pynag/0.8.9-1.
> found 768928 0.8.9-1
Bug #768928 {Done: Daniel Pocock } [pynag] wri
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 768928 0.8.9-1
Bug #768928 {Done: Daniel Pocock } [pynag] writes incorrect
timestamps in Nagios check result files
Marked as fixed in versions pynag/0.8.9-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 768928 0.9.1+dfsg-1
Bug #768928 {Done: Daniel Pocock } [pynag] writes incorrect
timestamps in Nagios check result files
Marked as fixed in versions pynag/0.9.1+dfsg-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 768928 0.9.1
Bug #768928 {Done: Daniel Pocock } [pynag] writes incorrect
timestamps in Nagios check result files
There is no source info for the package 'pynag' at version '0.9.1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for ve
Your message dated Mon, 10 Nov 2014 10:26:35 +0100
with message-id <546084cb.4040...@pocock.pro>
and subject line fixed upstream
has caused the Debian Bug report #768928,
regarding writes incorrect timestamps in Nagios check result files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Package: pynag
Severity: serious
Version: 0.8.9
PyNag is writing incorrect time stamps in the check result files for Nagios
This means Nagios silently ignores the check results submitted by
scripts that rely on PyNag
It is a known problem for users of syslog-nagios-bridge, which now
places a ver
33 matches
Mail list logo
