[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-babel_1.3+dfsg.1-3_amd64.changes

2014-02-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
/python-babel_1.3+dfsg.1-3_amd64.changes couldn't be processed for 48 hours and is now deleted All files it mentions are also removed: python-babel_1.3+dfsg.1-3.dsc, python-babel_1.3+dfsg.1-3.debian.tar.xz, python-pybabel_1.3+dfsg.1-3_all.deb, python-babel_1.3+dfsg.1-3_all.deb, python3-babel_1

[Python-modules-team] Bug#739617: closed by Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (Bug#739617: fixed in django-openid-auth 0.5-2)

2014-02-22 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:21:29 + ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the python-django-auth-openid package: > > #739617: python-django-auth-openid: Unusable with django 1.6 > > It has

[Python-modules-team] Bug#729828: marked as done (django-openid-auth: FTBFS with django-1.6)

2014-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:18:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#729828: fixed in django-openid-auth 0.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #729828, regarding django-openid-auth: FTBFS with django-1.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

[Python-modules-team] Bug#739617: marked as done (python-django-auth-openid: Unusable with django 1.6)

2014-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:18:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#739617: fixed in django-openid-auth 0.5-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #739617, regarding python-django-auth-openid: Unusable with django 1.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

[Python-modules-team] Bug#696902: marked as done (pyvorbis: Build with dh_python2)

2014-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2014 18:19:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#696902: fixed in pyvorbis 1.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #696902, regarding pyvorbis: Build with dh_python2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

[Python-modules-team] django-openid-auth_0.5-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-02-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:00:49 -0500 Source: django-openid-auth Binary: python-django-auth-openid Architecture: source all Version: 0.5-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team Change

[Python-modules-team] Processing of django-openid-auth_0.5-2_amd64.changes

2014-02-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
django-openid-auth_0.5-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: django-openid-auth_0.5-2.dsc django-openid-auth_0.5-2.debian.tar.xz python-django-auth-openid_0.5-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __

[Python-modules-team] Processed: your mail

2014-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 696902 + pending Bug #696902 [pyvorbis] pyvorbis: Build with dh_python2 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 696902: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696902 Deb

[Python-modules-team] Processed: your mail

2014-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 729828 + pending Bug #729828 [src:django-openid-auth] django-openid-auth: FTBFS with django-1.6 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 729828: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr

[Python-modules-team] python-pkginfo_1.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-02-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 16:05:06 +0100 Source: python-pkginfo Binary: python-pkginfo python-pkginfo-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team Chang

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-pkginfo_1.1-1_amd64.changes

2014-02-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
python-pkginfo_1.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-pkginfo_1.1-1.dsc python-pkginfo_1.1.orig.tar.gz python-pkginfo_1.1-1.debian.tar.xz python-pkginfo_1.1-1_all.deb python-pkginfo-doc_1.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemo

[Python-modules-team] Bug#739717: marked as done (python-cliff: Please version dependencies)

2014-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:26:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#739717: fixed in python-cliff 1.5.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #739717, regarding python-cliff: Please version dependencies to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

[Python-modules-team] python-cliff_1.5.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2014-02-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 15:22:53 +0100 Source: python-cliff Binary: python-cliff python3-cliff python-cliff-doc Architecture: source all Version: 1.5.2-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Te

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-cliff_1.5.2-1_amd64.changes

2014-02-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
python-cliff_1.5.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-cliff_1.5.2-1.dsc python-cliff_1.5.2.orig.tar.gz python-cliff_1.5.2-1.debian.tar.xz python-cliff_1.5.2-1_all.deb python3-cliff_1.5.2-1_all.deb python-cliff-doc_1.5.2-1_all.deb Greetings,

[Python-modules-team] Processed: your mail

2014-02-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 739717 + pending Bug #739717 [python-cliff] python-cliff: Please version dependencies Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 739717: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?