Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 18:26:28 -0400
Source: python-pip
Binary: python-pip python3-pip
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.4.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Python Modules Team
Changed-By: Barry
Your message dated Mon, 09 Sep 2013 22:48:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#722295: fixed in python-pip 1.4.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #722295,
regarding python-pip: ca-certificates needs to be Depends rather than Recommends
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
python-pip_1.4.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-pip_1.4.1-2.dsc
python-pip_1.4.1-2.debian.tar.gz
python-pip_1.4.1-2_all.deb
python3-pip_1.4.1-2_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
___
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 722295 + pending
Bug #722295 [python-pip] python-pip: ca-certificates needs to be Depends rather
than Recommends
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
722295: http://bugs.debia
Package: python-pip
Version: 1.4.1-1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
Since SSL certificate checks are now on by default, we really need
ca-certificates to be available for pip to be functional. I propose
to move it from Recommends to Depends.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 22:58:50 +0200
Source: python-docutils
Binary: python-docutils python3-docutils docutils-common docutils-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debi
python-docutils_0.11-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-docutils_0.11-2.dsc
python-docutils_0.11-2.debian.tar.gz
python-docutils_0.11-2_all.deb
python3-docutils_0.11-2_all.deb
docutils-common_0.11-2_all.deb
docutils-doc_0.11-2_all.deb
Greeti
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package sphinxcontrib-spelling
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
#
user bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org
# remote status report for #720342 (http://bugs.debian.org/720342)
# Bug title: [python-sphinxcont
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 18:34:06 +0200
Source: python-libdiscid
Binary: python-libdiscid python-libdiscid-dbg python3-libdiscid
python3-libdiscid-dbg python-libdiscid-doc
Architecture: source amd64 all
Version: 0.3.1-1
Distri
FYI: The status of the python-kyotocabinet source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: (not in testing)
Current version: 1.22-2
--
This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of
new packages into testing happens multiple times a
python-libdiscid_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-libdiscid_0.3.1-1.dsc
python-libdiscid_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz
python-libdiscid_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz
python-libdiscid_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
python-libdiscid-dbg_0.3.1-1_amd64.deb
python3-libdis
martin f krafft schrieb am Monday, den 09. September 2013:
> also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.09.1458 +0200]:
> > The package in question this time is libzmq3. As it is not in stable
> > at all, I assume that an unversioned dependency will be sufficient.
>
> Yes, if the dependency cannot be satisf
also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.09.1458 +0200]:
> The package in question this time is libzmq3. As it is not in stable
> at all, I assume that an unversioned dependency will be sufficient.
Yes, if the dependency cannot be satisfied from stable, I think that
backports will be used. Essentially it d
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:36 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.08.1538 +0200]:
>> My understanding is that backports are built against other backports,
>> but I have not yet witnessed it personally.
>
> This is not the case. Backports are built against stable as much as
also sprach Joe Healy [2013.09.08.1538 +0200]:
> My understanding is that backports are built against other backports,
> but I have not yet witnessed it personally.
This is not the case. Backports are built against stable as much as
possible. If you need a backport, you have to version the
build-
15 matches
Mail list logo