[Python-modules-team] Bug#664672: marked as done (python-numpy: testsuite failures in experimental)

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:47:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664672: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.6.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #664672, regarding python-numpy: testsuite failures in experimental to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655388: marked as done (python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format)

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:47:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655388: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.6.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #655388, regarding python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

[Python-modules-team] Bug#655014: marked as done (python-numpy: build without matplotlib (bootstrapping))

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:47:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655014: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.6.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #655014, regarding python-numpy: build without matplotlib (bootstrapping) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

[Python-modules-team] Bug#640940: marked as done (python-numpy: numpy.distutils not multiarch aware)

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 11 Apr 2012 06:47:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#640940: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.6.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #640940, regarding python-numpy: numpy.distutils not multiarch aware to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

[Python-modules-team] python-numpy_1.6.1-7_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: python-numpy-dbg_1.6.1-7_amd64.deb to main/p/python-numpy/python-numpy-dbg_1.6.1-7_amd64.deb python-numpy-doc_1.6.1-7_all.deb to main/p/python-numpy/python-numpy-doc_1.6.1-7_all.deb python-numpy_1.6.1-7.debian.tar.gz to main/p/python-numpy/python-numpy_1.6.1-7.debian.tar.gz pytho

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-numpy_1.6.1-7_amd64.changes

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
python-numpy_1.6.1-7_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-numpy_1.6.1-7.dsc python-numpy_1.6.1-7.debian.tar.gz python-numpy_1.6.1-7_amd64.deb python-numpy-dbg_1.6.1-7_amd64.deb python3-numpy_1.6.1-7_amd64.deb python3-numpy-dbg_1.6.1-7_amd64.deb

[Python-modules-team] Processed: your mail

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 640940 + pending Bug #640940 [python-numpy] python-numpy: numpy.distutils not multiarch aware Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 640940: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrep

[Python-modules-team] Processed: your mail

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 655388 + pending Bug #655388 [src:python-numpy] python-numpy: FTBFS: [m68k] unrecognised long double format Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 655388: http://bugs.debian.org

[Python-modules-team] Processed: your mail

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 655014 + pending Bug #655014 [src:python-numpy] python-numpy: build without matplotlib (bootstrapping) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 655014: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

[Python-modules-team] Processed: your mail

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 664672 + pending Bug #664672 [python-numpy] python-numpy: testsuite failures in experimental Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664672: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

[Python-modules-team] Processed: bug 664672 is forwarded to http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1578

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 664672 http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1578 Bug #664672 [python-numpy] python-numpy: testsuite failures in experimental Changed Bug forwarded-to-address to 'http://projects.scipy.org/numpy/ticket/1578' from 'http://projects.scip

[Python-modules-team] Payment!!!

2012-04-10 Thread BBC FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Contact: Dr. Jackson Cole Via:(bbcd...@siamza.com) For the claims of 18,000,000.00GBP Awarded to you by the BBC Finance Dept. ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailma

[Python-modules-team] python-clint_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: python-clint_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz to main/p/python-clint/python-clint_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz python-clint_0.3.1-1.dsc to main/p/python-clint/python-clint_0.3.1-1.dsc python-clint_0.3.1-1_all.deb to main/p/python-clint/python-clint_0.3.1-1_all.deb python-clint_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz

Re: [Python-modules-team] numpy 1.6.1 into unstable?

2012-04-10 Thread Julian Taylor
On 04/10/2012 10:56 AM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > Hello Yaroslav, > such questions are better asked on debian-python: few people reads the > pkging ml (cc added). > > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 22:02, Yaroslav Halchenko > wrote: >> sorry if that is obvious from somewhere but I wondered -- what are the >>

[Python-modules-team] simplejson 2.5.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

2012-04-10 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the simplejson source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.4.0-1 Current version: 2.5.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will rece

[Python-modules-team] python-urllib3 1.3-1 MIGRATED to testing

2012-04-10 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the python-urllib3 source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.2.2-1 Current version: 1.3-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will re

[Python-modules-team] python-django-extdirect 0.7-1 MIGRATED to testing

2012-04-10 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the python-django-extdirect source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.6-1 Current version: 0.7-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you

[Python-modules-team] python-clint_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2012-04-10 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi, * clint/packages/appdirs.py is copyright ActiveState Software and licensed under MIT * clint/packages/ordereddict.py is copyright Raymond Hettinger and licensed under MIT Please fix your copyright file. Cheers, Luca === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand

[Python-modules-team] Bug#608540: marked as done (python-cairo: New upstream version)

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:43:43 +0200 with message-id <20120410104343.ga28...@piware.de> and subject line Re: Bug#608540: python-cairo: New upstream version has caused the Debian Bug report #608540, regarding python-cairo: New upstream version to be marked as done. This means that you

[Python-modules-team] Bug#667590: marked as done (python-scitools: Adjust for the new octave package version 3.6.1)

2012-04-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:50:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667590: fixed in scitools 0.8-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #667590, regarding python-scitools: Adjust for the new octave package version 3.6.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

[Python-modules-team] scitools_0.8-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: python-scitools_0.8-2_all.deb to main/s/scitools/python-scitools_0.8-2_all.deb scitools_0.8-2.debian.tar.gz to main/s/scitools/scitools_0.8-2.debian.tar.gz scitools_0.8-2.dsc to main/s/scitools/scitools_0.8-2.dsc Changes: scitools (0.8-2) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/con

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-clint_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
python-clint_0.3.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: python-clint_0.3.1-1.dsc python-clint_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz python-clint_0.3.1-1.debian.tar.gz python-clint_0.3.1-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host rav

[Python-modules-team] Processing of scitools_0.8-2_amd64.changes

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
scitools_0.8-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: scitools_0.8-2.dsc scitools_0.8-2.debian.tar.gz python-scitools_0.8-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) __

Re: [Python-modules-team] numpy 1.6.1 into unstable?

2012-04-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Yaroslav, such questions are better asked on debian-python: few people reads the pkging ml (cc added). On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 22:02, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > sorry if that is obvious from somewhere but I wondered -- what are the > showstoppers preventing numpy 1.6.1 migration from noone-

[Python-modules-team] python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.gz to main/p/python-gitdb/python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.gz python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.dsc to main/p/python-gitdb/python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.dsc python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.deb to main/p/python-gitdb/python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.deb python-gitdb_0.5.4.orig.tar.g

[Python-modules-team] numpy 1.6.1 into unstable?

2012-04-10 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Guys, sorry if that is obvious from somewhere but I wondered -- what are the showstoppers preventing numpy 1.6.1 migration from noone-sees experimental to shiny and bleeding edge unstable? 1:1.5.1-4 is in both unstable and testing so I guess there is no other transition cooking and I thought i

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.dsc python-gitdb_0.5.4.orig.tar.gz python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.gz python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host r

[Python-modules-team] python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.changes is NEW

2012-04-10 Thread Debian FTP Masters
(new) python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.debian.tar.gz extra python (new) python-gitdb_0.5.4-1.dsc extra python (new) python-gitdb_0.5.4-1_amd64.deb extra python pure-Python git object database The GitDB project implements interfaces to allow read and write access to git repositories. In its core lies the db p