[Python-modules-team] Bug#489089: marked as done (pycurl: FTBFS: pycurl.c:2566: undefined reference to `PyErr_SetString')

2008-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:18:04 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#489089: FTBFS propably related to curl breakage in #488701 has caused the Debian Bug report #489089, regarding pycurl: FTBFS: pycurl.c:2566: undefined reference to

[Python-modules-team] pycallgraph_0.5.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: pycallgraph_0.5.1-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/pycallgraph/pycallgraph_0.5.1-1.diff.gz pycallgraph_0.5.1-1.dsc to pool/main/p/pycallgraph/pycallgraph_0.5.1-1.dsc pycallgraph_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/pycallgraph/pycallgraph_0.5.1.orig.tar.gz python-pycallgraph_0.5.1-1_all.deb

[Python-modules-team] simplejson_1.9.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: python-simplejson_1.9.2-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/s/simplejson/python-simplejson_1.9.2-1_amd64.deb simplejson_1.9.2-1.diff.gz to pool/main/s/simplejson/simplejson_1.9.2-1.diff.gz simplejson_1.9.2-1.dsc to pool/main/s/simplejson/simplejson_1.9.2-1.dsc simplejson_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz t

[Python-modules-team] Processing of simplejson_1.9.2-1_amd64.changes

2008-07-08 Thread Archive Administrator
simplejson_1.9.2-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: simplejson_1.9.2-1.dsc simplejson_1.9.2.orig.tar.gz simplejson_1.9.2-1.diff.gz python-simplejson_1.9.2-1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon ___

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489568: marked as done (FTBFS: build-depends on unavailable atlas on armel)

2008-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#489568: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #489568, regarding FTBFS: build-depends on unavailable atlas on armel to be marked as done. This means that you clai

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489726: marked as done (unconditional dependency on libatlas3gf-base)

2008-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#489726: fixed in python-numpy 1:1.1.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #489726, regarding unconditional dependency on libatlas3gf-base to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

[Python-modules-team] python-numpy_1.1.0-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2008-07-08 Thread Debian Installer
Accepted: python-numpy-dbg_1.1.0-3_amd64.deb to pool/main/p/python-numpy/python-numpy-dbg_1.1.0-3_amd64.deb python-numpy-doc_1.1.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/p/python-numpy/python-numpy-doc_1.1.0-3_all.deb python-numpy-ext_1.1.0-3_all.deb to pool/main/p/python-numpy/python-numpy-ext_1.1.0-3_all.

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489253: Fw: should numpy be built with atlas?

2008-07-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Tiziano Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > >> $ ./test_atlas.py >> Using ATLAS: >> 0.53141283989 >> $ wajig remove atlas3-base libatlas3gf-base >> $ ./test_atlas.py >> Using ATLAS: >> 1.64572000504 >> >> So it seems to work, even though the difference is

[Python-modules-team] Processing of python-numpy_1.1.0-3_amd64.changes

2008-07-08 Thread Archive Administrator
python-numpy_1.1.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-numpy_1.1.0-3.dsc python-numpy_1.1.0-3.diff.gz python-numpy-ext_1.1.0-3_all.deb python-numpy-doc_1.1.0-3_all.deb python-numpy_1.1.0-3_amd64.deb python-numpy-dbg_1.1.0-3_amd64.deb Greeting

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489253: Fw: should numpy be built with atlas?

2008-07-08 Thread Tiziano Zito
Hi Ondrej, > $ ./test_atlas.py > Using ATLAS: > 0.53141283989 > $ wajig remove atlas3-base libatlas3gf-base > $ ./test_atlas.py > Using ATLAS: > 1.64572000504 > > So it seems to work, even though the difference is not so big. the difference is not so big because the package contains a _dotblas.

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489253: should numpy be built with atlas?

2008-07-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Tiziano Zito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/8/08, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> thanks for the update. Looking at the blas package, I see that the >> cblas library is included in libblas3. So it looks like the numpy >> check is wrong, testing fo

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489253: should numpy be built with atlas?

2008-07-08 Thread Tiziano Zito
On 7/8/08, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > thanks for the update. Looking at the blas package, I see that the > cblas library is included in libblas3. So it looks like the numpy > check is wrong, testing for a package name, and not for a > feature. This seems to explain why it did

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489089: FTBFS propably related to curl breakage in #488701

2008-07-08 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi! The FTBFS bugreport against your package might be wrong, there has been a problem in curl, at least since 7.18.2-3 that was finally fixed in 7.18.2-5. Please try to build your package with the latest curl packages and seee if the breakage indeed is related to that curl bug or if the F

[Python-modules-team] Bug#489253: should numpy be built with atlas?

2008-07-08 Thread Matthias Klose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Package: python-numpy > > Version: 1:1.1.0-2 > > Severity: serious > > > > python-numpy now has an unconditional dependency on libatlas3gf-base, > > needing the "specialized" atlas libraries as