Sorry about the lack of response and the brusqeness of my original
report, but I didn't see a copy of your request for info for some
reason.
The problem was mainly lack of documentation I think. The entries member
isn't mentioned in the pydoc strings, and what help there is is very
vague. Now I've
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:19:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Doesn't apply
has caused the Debian Bug report #381079,
regarding fwd: A question on python-opengl package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489149: fixed in python-scipy 0.6.0-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #489149,
regarding python-scipy Numeric/Numpy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Accepted:
python-scipy_0.6.0-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/python-scipy/python-scipy_0.6.0-12.diff.gz
python-scipy_0.6.0-12.dsc
to pool/main/p/python-scipy/python-scipy_0.6.0-12.dsc
python-scipy_0.6.0-12_amd64.deb
to pool/main/p/python-scipy/python-scipy_0.6.0-12_amd64.deb
Override entries for
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Chris Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: python-scipy
> Version: 0.6.0-11
>
> The package description says:
>
> SciPy supplements the popular Numeric module, gathering a variety of
> high level science and engineering modules together as a single
> packa
python-scipy_0.6.0-12_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
python-scipy_0.6.0-12.dsc
python-scipy_0.6.0-12.diff.gz
python-scipy_0.6.0-12_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
___
Python-modules-te
Package: python-scipy
Version: 0.6.0-11
The package description says:
SciPy supplements the popular Numeric module, gathering a variety of
high level science and engineering modules together as a single
package.
SciPy includes modules for graphics and plotting, optimization,
integrat
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:32:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#455896: fixed in pyopengl 3.0.0~b3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #455896,
regarding missing Togl breaks pydoc in OpenGL/TK/__init__.py
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:32:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#454988: fixed in pyopengl 3.0.0~b3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #454988,
regarding python-opengl: Segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:32:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#485594: fixed in pyopengl 3.0.0~b3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #485594,
regarding python-opengl: python 2.4/2.5 dependency
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Accepted:
pyopengl_3.0.0~b3-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/pyopengl/pyopengl_3.0.0~b3-1.diff.gz
pyopengl_3.0.0~b3-1.dsc
to pool/main/p/pyopengl/pyopengl_3.0.0~b3-1.dsc
pyopengl_3.0.0~b3.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/pyopengl/pyopengl_3.0.0~b3.orig.tar.gz
python-opengl-doc_3.0.0~b3-1_all.deb
to pool
Hi,
does this bug still persist? It looks like the GL libraries are missing,
but that should have been handled by the 3.0.0~b1 already.
best,
Torsten
--
.: Torsten Marek
.: http://shlomme.diotavelli.net
.: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- GnuPG: 1024D/A244C858
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein d
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:12:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing the report
has caused the Debian Bug report #480657,
regarding python-opengl: Using glutDisplayFunc and glutKeyboardFunc causes
Segmentation Fault in glutMainLoop
to be marked as done.
pyopengl_3.0.0~b3-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
pyopengl_3.0.0~b3-1.dsc
pyopengl_3.0.0~b3.orig.tar.gz
pyopengl_3.0.0~b3-1.diff.gz
python-opengl_3.0.0~b3-1_all.deb
python-opengl-doc_3.0.0~b3-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Package: pycurl
Version: 7.18.2-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080702 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
> gcc -pthread -shared -g -O2 build/temp.linux-i686-2.4/
15 matches
Mail list logo