Peter Wang wrote:
> Edward,
>
> This isn't in response to any specific one of the 100+ posts on this
> thread, but I justed wanted to encourage you to continue your
> investigation into Python component models and maybe looking for some
> common ground between them. Frequently the individual deve
Anton Vredegoor wrote:
> Paul Rubin wrote(>>):
[...]
> All of the books writers seem to have not caught up with the idea of
> hyperlinks and continue to dwell in neolithical paper dreams :-)
>
> If they only woke up and let someone like me write some Visual Python
> code to illustrate the algori
Christoph Zwerschke wrote:
> Bryan Olson schrieb:
>
>>> Still think there is no such thing?
>>
>>
>> Uh, yes.
>>
>>The Cartesian product of two sets A and B (also called the
>>product set, set direct product, or cross product) is defined to
>>be the set of [...]
>>
>> All sets, no stri
ility, flexibility,
and dynamism (including on-the-fly model building/testing/correction) as
well as model introspecting and exploration capabilities are of critical
importance and sometimes the indication to a missing link. It does not
hurt to remember that the original idea (by S.Ulam) of a com
Hi The List:
I have a modeling app where i'm detecting events (in temporal
dynamics) applying a set of (boolean) functions - kind of:
event_list = "f1 f2 etc".split() # each fi detects a specific event
i have defs for functions fi, or simple boolean expressions for each, so
that evList is a
