what would be a good means of finding where the 0.11 version of
edgewall trac uses excessive memory. see
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev/browse_thread/thread/116e519da54f16b
for some details, where jonas suggested
http://wingolog.org/archives/2007/11/27/reducing-the-footprint-of-python-appl
On Jan 19, 10:31 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
>
> > Hi Christian,
>
> > -On [20080119 16:16], Christian Heimes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> I forgot one important point in my reply. The GC module contains some
> >> useful methods for debu
On Jan 20, 12:40 pm, "rupert.thurner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Jan 19, 10:31 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
>
> > > Hi Christian,
>
> > > -On [20080119 1
On Jan 20, 2:59 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rupert.thurner wrote:
> > i forgot to mention that i cannot see any explicit sys._getframe(), or
> > __del__ in the genshi code, while the ones intrac-core seemed to be
> > there in 0.10.4.
>
> Do
On Jan 20, 2:59 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rupert.thurner wrote:
> > i forgot to mention that i cannot see any explicit sys._getframe(), or
> > __del__ in the genshi code, while the ones intrac-core seemed to be
> > there in 0.10.4.
>
> Do
the edgewall trac release 0.11 is blocked now since more than one
month for a memory leak nobody is able to find, see
http://groups.google.com/group/trac-dev/browse_thread/thread/116e519da54f16b
.
does python-3.0 improve something to avoid writing memory leaking
applications?
rupert.
--
http://m
On Feb 10, 9:08 pm, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> rupert.thurner wrote:
> > does python-3.0 improve something to avoid writing memory leaking
> > applications?
>
> No, it doesn't. Python 3.0 and maybe 2.6 are going to have some small
> impro
