> And what is F*EX?
> ==> Frams' Fast File EXchange, a service for transfering files of ANY size
> from any user A to any user B in the internet.
> For details see: http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/
>
> I am now looking for beta testers. If you are interested, send me a mail.
Can you tell us a git
On Dec 13, 2015 7:20 AM, "William Abdo" wrote:
>
> Problem Resolved.
> I have fixed the Oracle connection issue under Windows 10 with cx_Oracle .
> PYODBC was only failing on the Oracle connection and worked fine on MS
SQL under Windows 10.
Please tell us what the fix is. Thanks.
--
https://mail
On Dec 15, 2015 9:22 AM, "William Abdo" wrote:
>
> So I started a search for an Oracle based ODBC client since PYODBC is
still working with the Microsoft DB’s, I tried cx_Oracle and it worked
perfectly after I managed to get the parameters correct on the call,
It sounds like PYODBC cannot connect
On Dec 15, 2015 10:34 AM, "William Abdo" wrote:
>
> Yes Paul Hermeneutic , that is correct.
>
> I tried everything I could however, I was unable to make PYODBC talk
to Oracle under Windows 10.
It would be of help to everyone if you would file a bug report on the issue
tracker. http://bugs.pyth
On Dec 15, 2015 12:00 PM, "William Abdo" wrote:
>
> As you wish,
>
> [issue577] PYODBC will not talk to Oracle under Windows 10.
Where is this issue filed? I do not see it on http://bugs.python.org/
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 15, 2015 1:32 PM, "William Abdo" wrote:
>
> issue 25875 created
> I put it in the wrong area the first time.
> First time bug tracker user errors.
My apologies, William. I thought bugs.python.org would be the right place
to put it. I was wrong.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Jan 9, 2016 7:56 AM, "tommy roberts" wrote:
>
> It will not allow my to run python 3.5.1
Python 3.4 is the last version that will run on Windows XP.
If this is not your problem, please provide more information.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I am confident that in a few years there will be sufficient new
developments in language design that some degree of backward compatibility
would be worth dropping in order to provide greater capabilities. If it
needs to fork and become another language, that's OK.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailma
I prefer (x is None) and (x is not None).
This matches the SQL concept of NULL.
(X = NULL) is not valid since NULL is not a value and cannot be compared
with anything.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 29, 2016 6:51 AM, "Dennis Lee Bieber" wrote:
>
>
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/perl-to-python-migration-martin-c-brown/1004847881?ean=9780201734881
Given that this was published in 2001, surely it is time for a second
edition.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
This might be helpful.
https://docs.python.org/3/distributing/index.html
See also
https://docs.python.org/3/library/venv.html?highlight=venv#module-venv
Folks;
coming from a server-sided Java background, I'm recently exploring
frameworks such as cherrypy or webpy for building RESTful services,
The installer should detect that it is being run on an unsupported system
and do something helpful.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> A lot of our in base weird python comes from heavily C-wired people:
>
> The classic
> for i in range(len(alist)):
> print alist[i]
>
> with its twin brother
>
> i=0
> while i < len(alist):
> print alist[i]
> i += 1
>
> And the even more annoying
>
> result = Result()
> getResult(result)
>
>> I'm suprised. Why not just:
>>
>> list(str(results))
>>
>> In other words, is there something else the list constructor should do
>> with a string other than convert it to a list?
>>
> The OP wanted the result to be a list of ints, not a list of strings.
[int(x) for x in list(str(results))]
--
Good idea.
>>> [int(x) for x in str(results)]
[1, 2, 3]
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Oct 1, 2015 1:06 AM, wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is there anyway i can login to remote servers at once and do the
activity, i can do one by one using for loop..
>
If you want to start them all at the same time, look into subprocess and
popen.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Python 3 has venv in the kit. Is there a reason users should get the
virtualenv add-on?
On Oct 1, 2015 10:28 AM, "Chris Warrick" wrote:
> The Nikola developers decided to deprecate Python 2.7 support.
> Starting with v7.7.2, Nikola will display a warning if Python 2.7 is
> used (but it will still
On Oct 2, 2015 12:31 PM, "Kenneth L" wrote:
> I'm not sure about the plugin route. I'm not looking to build a plug,
lol. Just a finger to point me where to go/start.
Writing a plug-in for an existing open source project would be a good
starting point to see how others have approached graphics ap
On Oct 8, 2015 7:31 AM, "MICHAEL" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Please forgive a new user's ignorance.
>
> I am trying to install Python 3.5.0 on my laptop (Windows 10). The
default installation directory is shown as c:\Users\(my user
name)\AppData\Local\Programs\Python\Python35-32. However, if I select
C
On Oct 13, 2015 1:16 PM, "Uday Pethakamsetty"
wrote:
> The problem is that when I installed python 3.5, all the pip installs are
directing to python 3.5, instead of my native python 2.7.
>
Probably, this is because the Python 3 directories appears first in the
PATH variable.
Python 3 has venv.
> Where do I find the "command line" ?
Welcome to Python.
Starting a command shell depends on which operating system you are running.
If you are on Microsoft Windows, choose the Start button, then type "cmd"
into the edit control, then press Enter.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/py
> Where can I find that folder? Or can I just ignore it for now (and get
the documentation elsewhere)?
If the install was done for "all users" on the machine, then the Python
installation directory will be under " %SystemRoot%\Program Files\" for
64-bit or "%SystemRoot%\Program Files (x86)\" for 3
On Nov 1, 2015 2:45 AM, "Chris Angelico" wrote:
>
> I'm proud to say that a Python tutoring company has just converted its
> course over from teaching Python 2.7 to teaching 3.x. For the
> naysayers out there, it actually wasn't much of a transition;
This would make an excellent opportunity to de
Would some form of subprocess.Popen() on cmp or fc /b be easier?
On Nov 12, 2015 7:13 AM, "Tim Chase" wrote:
> On 2015-11-12 08:21, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> > And if you really wanted to compare two files that are known to
> > contain MD5 checksums, the simplest way is:
> >
> >with open('f1.md
The installer of some applications will replace the shebang to refer to a
specific version of Python. By doing so, it avoids problems when someone
upgrades the default Python version in the PATH.
On Nov 14, 2015 11:00 PM, "eryksun" wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Zachary Ware
> wrote:
25 matches
Mail list logo
