xiaobin yang wrote:
Hi, if i am already skillful with c++. Is it useful to learn python? thanks!
Does skillful mean you can do anything with ease and quick enough for
you and your clients ? Are your results bug free and easy to maintain ?
If the answer to all this is yes then probably not. If t
Achim Domma (Procoders) wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking for frameworks to make testing web applications - i.e.
parsing and filling out forms - easier. I found Puffin, which looks good
but not very usable in the current state. I know that I once read about
other nice frameworks, but could not find one via
Nick Vargish wrote:
Leo Breebaart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
That suggests
to me an "obvious default" of the kind that exists elsewhere in
Python as well.
I feel pretty much the opposite... If a non-string-type has managed to
get into my list-of-strings, then something has gone wrong and I would
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
"news.sydney.pipenetworks.com" wrote:
Nick "Explicit is better than Implicit"
Really ? Then why are you using python. Python or most dynamic languages are are so great because
of their common sense towards the "implicit". You must have heard o
Nick Vargish wrote:
"news.sydney.pipenetworks.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Really ? Then why are you using python.
Try "import this" at a Python prompt. I didn't invent "Explicit is
better than implicit."
Thanks for the pointer. Let's see how man
Duncan Booth wrote:
news.sydney.pipenetworks.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this has been raised in the thread but I sure as heck
always convert my join arguments using str(). When does someone use
.join() and not want all arguments to be strings ? Any examples ?
This has already been raised
Jeremy Bowers wrote:
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:19:44 +1100, news.sydney.pipenetworks.com wrote:
Thanks for the pointer. Let's see how many zen points are for the OP's
idea vs against
Along with the fact that I agree with Nick that you've seriously
miscounted (most of your &q
Jeremy Bowers wrote:
By the way, just to be clear, my infinitesimal's dad can beat up your
infinitesimal's dad any day of the week.
Ouchit's getting personal :-). Your dad may be infinitesimal but my
dad is a complex number (I'm not joking, he really has a real and
imaginary part).
(Looks li
Nick Vargish wrote:
"news.sydney.pipenetworks.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I always wished computer science was more engineering then
philosophy. That way there'd always be an obvious answer.
You don't have a lot of experience with philosophers, do you?
No
Most of
I looked for a new language for my hobby programming. I used to use
Turbo Pascal for 10 years and then C++ for 6 years. A couple of
weeks ago, I narrowed my decision to C#, Ruby, and Python. At the
moment, I want to go with Python, but you can definitely see that
it's the oldest one: Many parts
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
news.sydney.pipenetworks.com a Ãcrit :
I looked for a new language for my hobby programming. I used to use
Turbo Pascal for 10 years and then C++ for 6 years. A couple of
weeks ago, I narrowed my decision to C#, Ruby, and Python. At the
moment, I want to go with
Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone a écrit :
Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is actually. Ruby's syntax is mostly consistent and coherent, and
there is much less special cases than in Python.
I'd be glad to know which special cases are you referring to.
gf gf wrote:
Is there a simple way to log to a debug console in
Python?
In .NET, you can Debug.Write(str), which does nothing
if there is no debug console open, but, if there is,
debugs the message. Is there something similar?
Alternatively, is there a very simple log4j type
setup? I emphasize ve
Torsten Bronger wrote:
HallÃchen!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Boddie) writes:
Torsten Bronger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At first, I was very pleased by Python's syntax (and still I am).
Then, after two weeks, I learned about descriptors and
metaclasses and such and understood nothing (for the first
Torsten Bronger wrote:
HallÃchen!
"news.sydney.pipenetworks.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Torsten Bronger wrote:
[...]
I have exactly the same impression, but for me it's the reason
why I feel uncomfortable with them. For example, I fear that a
skilled package writer
Rob Cranfill wrote:
Kent Johnson wrote:
It is in the latest docs.
Kent
No, it isn't. (But thanks for replying anyway!)
http://docs.python.org/lib/logging-config-fileformat.html
You're looking in the wrong place. Try
http://docs.python.org/lib/node333.html
Huy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/
Jeff Shannon wrote:
news.sydney.pipenetworks.com wrote:
More in relation to the original topic, why can't people just ignore
features they don't understand and may never use directly.
Because they may get stuck maintaining code that uses those features.
Now, I'm generally in
Lutz Horn wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I've been searching high and low for a way to simply convert a small
XML configuration file to Python data structures.
Take a look at Amara (http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/4Suite/amara/).
Lutz
Amara rules xml to python conversions. I've used it successfully
Rob Cranfill wrote:
news.sydney.pipenetworks.com wrote:
You're looking in the wrong place. Try
http://docs.python.org/lib/node333.html
which isn't quite the page in question, but leads to the closest
pertinent page,
http://docs.python.org/lib/logging-config-fileformat.html
which *
19 matches
Mail list logo
