Since you are starting a new project you may want to look into
something new and different
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hello everybody,
Gluon 1.15 is out. This is a free open source framework for agile
development of secure database driven web applications, written in
Python, programmable in Python. Stable API and supported since October
1st 2007.
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu
http://www.vimeo.com/428474 (video tutor
Hi Paul,
yes, the model designer is the one from Ondras. We modified it so that
it generates DAL (Database Abstraction Layer) code instead of SQL and
it is a work in progress.
Technically it is not pat of web2py and in fact it is not distributed
with it.
It is just one of the many web2py apps.
You
Interesting post. I would like to make some comments about design
decisions that went into web2py:
- For each app Model/View/Controllers/Language Files/Static Files/
Modules/Cron Tasks are stored in separated folders
- You can code only the models (no controllers and no view) and you
get a fully f
On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
Of course I am the most biased person in the worl
Errata. I said "The dal supports transactions" where I meant "the dal
supports migrations".
Of course it also supports "transactions" as well as "distributed
transactions".
On Dec 19, 5:32 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck w
web2py. They can be
distributed under any license you like, included closed source and
bundled with the web2py binary.
On Dec 19, 5:32 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
>
> > Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> > k
> Why does web2py have classes that represent HTML? I can't see ever
> needing to write VIEW code in my controller, since thats what views are
> for.
You do not need to use but if, for example, you want to build a menu
recursively, having a server-side presentation of the DOM allows to do
it witho
About you point 3). You may want to look into:
http://www.web2py.com/php
It translates a PHP page into a web2py template. It is crude and
primitive and fails in some cases. Moreover a literal translation is
not what you really want since you want to follow a more MVC design.
Moreover it will not
multiple database
connection to postgresq, mysql and/or firebird.
I think this is related to the topic because it is a distinctive
feature of web2py.
Massimo
On Dec 20, 1:32 pm, Lacrima wrote:
> On Dec 20, 1:35 am, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > Errata. I said "The dal supports transactions&qu
People seem to think that because web2py has a default for almost
everything (part of its design) than you must use the default.
- There is a web based IDE but you *can* use the shell instead (like
you do in Django)
- There are migrations but you *can* disable then (and it works like
Django that d
> > On Dec 19, 12:42 am, AppRe Godeck wrote:
> >> Just curious if anybody prefers web2py over django, and visa versa. I
> >> know it's been discussed on a flame war level a lot. I am looking for a
> >> more intellectual reasoning behind using one or the other.
>
> > Of course I am the most biased
There is huge difference between what Steve is asking and spam.
Spam is "Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent
indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or
newsgroups".
Steve is asking us help him to identify communities that we may be
part of and that we believe m
Some may find useful to compare:
- A Crash Course on Django
http://articles.sitepoint.com/article/django-crash-course
- A Crash Course on Web2py
http://www.web2py.com/AlterEgo/default/show/253
They basically describe the same app and the steps to built it. Sorry
I had not time to make screenshot
This is a new wsgi web server implemented in a single file.
http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/browse/gluon/sneaky.py
I could use some help with testing.
Here is a version for Python 3.0
http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/browse/gluon/sneaky.py
Massimo
On Dec 25, 12:38 pm, a...@pytho
Perhaps this can be useful:
http://www.web2py.com/examples/spreadsheet
The code is in a single file with not dependencies and it does not
require web2py to run:
http://code.google.com/p/web2py/source/browse/gluon/contrib/spreadsheet.py
Here is a sample controller that shows you how to embed the
s
xmlrpc acts at the application layer and ssl at the transport layer so
they can inter operate easily as long as you do not use the
certificate to authenticate the client but only validate the server
and encrypt data (which you can also do but it is more complicated)
One option for you is to use we
l be reading a little into web2py.
>
> bye
>
> N
>
> mdipierro wrote:
> > xmlrpc acts at the application layer and ssl at the transport layer so
> > they can inter operate easily as long as you do not use the
> > certificate to authenticate the client but only valida
On Oct 19, 9:01 am, flebber wrote:
> In short it seems to me that Django and Web2py include more "magic" in
> assisting oneself to create you web/application, whilst Pylons and
> Werkzueg leave more control in the users hands hopefully leading to
> greater expression and power.
it depends on how
One more clarification to avoid confusion. Django has "admin" and it
is great. Web2py also has something called "admin" but that is not
apples to apples.
The closest thing to Django "admin" in web2py is called "appadmin" (it
comes with it).
For example consider the following complete program:
100,000 hits a day is not a low. I get that some day on my web server
without problem and without one request dropped.
Most frameworks web2py, Django, Pylons can handle that kind of load
since Python is not the bottle neck.
You have to follow some tricks:
1) have the web server serve static pages
On Mar 1, 6:32 am, simn_stv wrote:
...
>
> > You have to follow some tricks:
>
> > 1) have the web server serve static pages directly and set the pragma
> > cache expire to one month
> > 2) cache all pages that do not have forms for at least few minutes
> > 3) avoid database joins
>
> but this wou
22 matches
Mail list logo
