Hi all,
I'm having trouble with multiprocessing I'm using it to speed up some
simulations, I find for large queues when the process reaches the
poison pill it does not exit whereas for smaller queues it works
without any problems. Has anyone else had this trouble? Can anyone
tell me a way around i
Sorry
###fortran
call###
is meant to be
###fortran call###
Matt
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 31 July, 11:27, Piet van Oostrum wrote:
> >>>>> ma3mju (m) wrote:
> >m> Hi all,
> >m> I'm having trouble with multiprocessing I'm using it to speed up some
> >m> simulations, I find for large queues when the process reaches the
> >
On 31 July, 11:34, MRAB wrote:
> ma3mju wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> > I'm having trouble with multiprocessing I'm using it to speed up some
> > simulations, I find for large queues when the process reaches the
> > poison pill it does not exit whereas for
On 2 Aug, 15:48, ma3mju wrote:
> On 31 July, 11:34, MRAB wrote:
>
>
>
> > ma3mju wrote:
> > > Hi all,
>
> > > I'm having trouble with multiprocessing I'm using it to speed up some
> > > simulations, I find for large queues when the proc
On 2 Aug, 21:49, Piet van Oostrum wrote:
> > MRAB (M) wrote:
> >M> I wonder whether one of the workers is raising an exception, perhaps due
> >M> to lack of memory, when there are large number of jobs to process.
>
> But that wouldn't prevent the join. And you would probably get an
> exceptio
On 3 Aug, 09:36, ma3mju wrote:
> On 2 Aug, 21:49, Piet van Oostrum wrote:
>
> > >>>>> MRAB (M) wrote:
> > >M> I wonder whether one of the workers is raising an exception, perhaps due
> > >M> to lack of memory, when there are large number of j
On 3 Aug, 09:36, ma3mju wrote:
> On 2 Aug, 21:49, Piet van Oostrum wrote:
>
> > >>>>> MRAB (M) wrote:
> > >M> I wonder whether one of the workers is raising an exception, perhaps due
> > >M> to lack of memory, when there are large number of j
On 7 Aug, 16:02, MRAB wrote:
> ma3mju wrote:
> > On 3 Aug, 09:36, ma3mju wrote:
> >> On 2 Aug, 21:49, Piet van Oostrum wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> MRAB (M) wrote:
> >>>> M> I wonder whether one of the workers is raising an exceptio