Of course there is the always the iteration method:
list = [1, True, True, False, False, True]
status = True
for each in list:
status = status and each
but what is your best way to test for for False in a list?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I'm tryin to use regexp to replace multi-line c-style comments (like /* this
/n */ ) with /n (newlines).
I tried someting like re.sub('/\*(.*)/\*' , '/n' , file)
but it doesn't work for multiple lines.
besides that I want to keep all newlines as they were in the original file, so
I can
got
a feeling the overall structure is up the creek.
approx 220 LOC.
file: GodCast.py
Cheers,
Lex.
#!/usr/bin/python
# GodCast: podcast aggregator!
# depends on wget & lynx
# * one of the main features of GodCast is it's use of bandwidth.
#Many podcatchers
# http://www.faqts.com/k
Probably not a big difference in most cases between debian, ubuntu,
fedora. The latter two may be more likely to have more recent
versions.
I'm pretty sure ubuntu is the only one which currently has python 3.0
in it's archives [no, it's not the default version].
On 06/01/2009, member thudfoo wro
Hello!
Has anyone tried to build an implementation of subject in Python?
Any help is appreciated!
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Wed, 26 May 2010 05:26:56 -0700, alex23 wrote:
> On May 26, 7:21 pm, Lex Lebedeff wrote:
>> Has anyone tried to build an implementation of subject in Python? Any
>> help is appreciated!
>
> http://www.dia.fi.upm.es/~jamartin/download.htm
>
> Seriously, though,
