On Mar 7, 6:59 pm, Carl Banks wrote:
>
> I see that Brett Canon's importlib has finally made it into Python
> standard library. Congrats there (if you still read this list), I am
> struggling with Python's arcane import semantics (for something
> ridiculously silly) now and I feel your pain.
>
H
On Apr 12, 12:04 pm, Gabriel wrote:
> r wrote:
> > On Apr 12, 8:07 am, Gabriel wrote:
>
> >> Hello,
>
> >> I'm python newbie and i need to write gui for my school work in python.
> >> I need to write it really quick,
>
> > [snip]
>
> > Tkinter is built-in, why not start there?
>
> > from Tkinter
On Apr 14, 3:01 am, blahemailb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> 1) Rake - is there an equivalent of Rake? I've seen a bit about SCons,
> and it looks really nice, but it seems geared towards being a Make
> replacement for C/C++ rather than something that's used to work with
> Python itself. Is there anythin
On Apr 21, 2:46 pm, SKYLAB wrote:
> Greetings..
>
> First , my english is not good .
>
> I heard that was written in python ( Youtube Programming Language :
> PYTHON :S ) Correct ?
>
> That's not correct ? Then youtube is PHP application ?
>
> That's correct ; Which python web framework in friendf
On Jun 26, 6:08 pm, Thomas Allen wrote:
> On Jun 25, 3:29 am, Private Private wrote:
>
>
> > Can you suggest anything ?
>
> I don't think anything's lighter than web.py.
>
> http://webpy.org/
>
My impression is that webpy is intended for experienced users who
might otherwise just write all their
On Jun 26, 8:48 pm, Randy Foiles wrote:
> Hello and thank you for taking your time to read this.
> I was interested in learning about python. In the long ago past I did
> learn some programing but I have not used any of it for years. I do
> remember some basics however so the book does n
On Jun 27, 2:25 am, "laplacia...@gmail.com"
wrote:
>
> As Thomas suggests, maybe have a look at Werkzeug ...
Typo: s/Thomas/Petr/
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
I just read a blog post of Guido's
http://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2009/06/ironpython-in-action-and-decline-of.html
and notice that he doesn't comment on what he wants in a GUI toolkit
for Python.
I sorta' wish he'd just come out and say, "This is what I think would
be suitable for a GUI toolkit f
On Jun 27, 1:47 pm, Terry Reedy wrote:
> laplacia...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > So, what *does* Guido want in a GUI toolkit for Python?
>
> What he did say is "But it hasn't really gotten any less complex to
> create the simplest of simple UIs. And that's a shame