I have to merge two dictionaries into one, and in
a "shallow" way: changing items should be possible
by operating either on two parents or on a
new dictionary. I am open to suggestions how
to do this (values are always numbers, BTW), but
I tried to do it by creating a dict-like class that just
for
(sorry for posting empty post by accident)
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> it stops working -- probably a side-effect of some optimization.
> So if you change your hubDict's base class from dict to object you should
> get the desired behaviour.
Yes, as already noted, this would require p
Bryan wrote:
> I get the same bug-like behavior in 3.1. I think Peter is right that
> it's probably a side-effect of an optimization. kkumer seems to have
> completely over-ridden the methods of dict, but if we insert into his
> hubDict with the parent class's method:
>
