We don't have Python implementations for one program, and a
couple of the Python programs we do have show Error.
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=python&lang2=python
Please contribute missing Python programs or faster more-elegant Python
programs.
Please follow the
We don't scrape programs from news-groups, if you'd like the program to
be shown on the shootout then please attach the source code to a
tracker item.
Please follow the FAQ instructions
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/faq.php#contribute
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a direct translation o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Bengt Richter wrote:
> > On 29 Nov 2005 14:08:12 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >We don't scrape programs from news-groups, if you'd like the program to
> > >be shown on the shootout then please attach the source code to a
> > >tracker item.
> > You asked for so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a direct translation of the D code, maybe it's not the faster
> Python implementation, and surely it's not the shorter one. But Psyco
> makes it much faster (Psyco likes "low level" style code).
And if you contributed the program like this
http://shootout.alioth
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Bengt Richter wrote:
>
> > That's not just blunt and concise, it looks like the modus operandi
> > of a typical volunteer/employee-exploiter (or perhaps spoiled brat,
> > the typical precursor to the former).
>
> careful. his faq requires you to "be nice".
>
>
"Be Nice!"
Paul Boddie wrote:
> Steven Bethard wrote:
> > David Rasmussen wrote:
> > Faster than assembly? LOL... :)
> >
> Faster than physics? ;-)
>
> > I think the claim goes something along the lines of "assembly is so
> hard
> > to get right that if you can automatically generate it from a HLL,
> not
> >
> The Language Shootout at http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ has code
> samples in many languages, both interpreted and compiled, including
the
> ones you mentioned. Don't trust the lines-of-code statistics, though
--
> the LOC measure is wrongly shown as zero for several codes, and
comment
> line
We've made it somewhat easier to contribute programs.
No need to subscribe to the mailing-list.
No need for a user-id or login.
See the FAQ "How can I contribute a program?"
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/faq.php
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> > How about the speed of execution?
>
> There is no simple answer. Both languages use C functions which are
> executed at CPU speed. But with interpreted code Python seems to be
> approximately 3-4 times faster than PHP
(http://dada.perl.it/shootout/).
The Win32 Computer Language Shootout hasn'
Peter Maas wrote:
> Paul McGuire wrote:
> > The advance method is the most fertile place for optimization, since it is
> > called approximately n(n-1)/2 times (where n=2E7). I was able to trim about
> > 25% from the Python runtime with these changes:
> [...]
>
> My results:
>
> Your changes: 18%
Donn Cave wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Chris Mellon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > They won't say Java. Ask them why Python is interpreted and Java isn't
> > and you'll have a hard time getting a decent technical answer, because
> > Python isn't all that different from Java
Magnus Lycka wrote:
> Isaac Gouy wrote:
> >>I think it is wrong to call Python "very slow" just because it is slower
> >>than some other language or languages, for the same reason it would be
> >>wrong to describe the population of the UK as "very low" because 60
> >>million people is a smaller nu
12 matches
Mail list logo
