On 27 juin, 22:48, Karim wrote:
>
> Euhhh, j'ai pas tout suivi. C'est quoi la feinte?
>
Perso je suis pas sûr qu'il y en ait une.
Je dirais que l'OP a peut-être eu un grand besoin de café crème sucré
et a voulu partager son plaisir avec d'autres, why not
Le jeudi 27 décembre 2012 21:01:16 UTC+1, mogul a écrit :
> 'Aloha!
>
holà !
>
> I'm new to python, got 10-20 years perl and C experience, all gained on unix
> alike machines hacking happily in vi, and later on in vim.
>
About same than me, though I had not to use/work with perl for new proj
Le samedi 21 avril 2012 10:46:39 UTC+2, Alexander Blinne a écrit :
> Am 21.04.2012 05:25, schrieb Rotwang:
>
> This happens only because the first [] gets destroyed after evaluation
> of id([]). The second [] then by accident gets the same id as the first
> one had.
>
> >>> a = []
> >>> b = []
>
Le mardi 14 mars 2023 à 02:32:23 UTC-4, Clint Olsen a écrit :
> We have an application that involves submitting hundreds to thousands of jobs
> to a shared computing resource, and we're using asyncio to do so because it
> is far less overhead than threading or multiprocessing for the bookkeeping
Le lundi 26 décembre 2016 10:34:48 UTC-5, Alec Taylor a écrit :
> So I'm putting .info in one StringIO and .error in another StringIO.
>
> How do I stop them from both being put into both?
>
> Code: http://ideone.com/Nj6Asz
Hi,
it's doable with filter on the handlers:
def exact_filter(level)
I know this does not bring anything valuable but:
Definitively agree with your mental model !! 'then' and only "then" is the best
keyword in the situation which is on the table right now.
it totally fix the confusing "else" actual mess (for at least 2 reasons).
Python 4.0 ? My son will thank us
Heuh case 2 :
"String1" or "String2"
Evaluates to "String1" ?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Le mercredi 23 mars 2016 04:52:02 UTC-4, Peter Otten a écrit :
> Nick Eubank wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> >
> > Found an odd behavior I'd never known about today, not sure if it's a bug
> > or known. Python 3.4.4 (anaconda).
> > True, False, 0, 1 can all be used as dictionary keys.
> >
> > Bu
elf)
if r.startswith('iso'):
return 'iso-' + r[3:]
return r
>>>
>>> email.charset.Charset.__str__ = patched
>>>
>>> str(c)
'iso-8859-7'
>>>
regards,
gst.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Le dimanche 14 décembre 2014 14:10:22 UTC-5, Stefanos Karasavvidis a écrit :
> thanks for replying gst.
>
> I've thought already of patching the Charset class, but hoped for a cleaner
> solution.
>
>
> This ALIASES dict has already all the iso names *with* a dash.
None
>
> for an arbitrary number of parameters.
>
> What is the best way to achieve this?
>
> Thanks
in the __init__, simply do:
self.__dict__.update(**parms)
regards,
gst.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
What if you try with all the SQLite code commented ?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 17 jan, 15:16, Jérôme wrote:
> Hi all.
>
hi,
just my 2 cents:
you have quite lot of such test:
> if self._index is 0:
I think it's better to compare with equality against 0 (or other
needed value) ; that is:
if self._index == 0:
otherwise your code looks very nice to me, though I just ha
Hi,
I met a situation where I was passing an object created in/with an
upper level module class to a lower level module class' instance in
one of its __init__ argument and saving a ref of the upper object in
that lower level class' new instance.
But in my IDE I want the completion to also work fr
On 8 déc, 11:45, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 07:52:06 -0800, gst wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > But in my IDE I want the completion to also work from within the lower
> > level module when it's refering to the object passed from the upper
> > level
On 8 déc, 14:09, Steve Holden wrote:
>
> If you'd told us which IDE you were using we might have offered better
> advice, but you seem to want to keep that a secret ("my IDE" tells us
> nothing).
>
sorry it was totally bottom of my first message :
> note: I'm using Eclipse 3.5.2 with pydev so (I
On 8 déc, 15:51, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
Hi,
> gst wrote:
> > nb: so this "hack" is only relevant during dev ; once the project
> > would be finished the "hack" could be removed (i.e : in class2 init I
> > would directly do : self.object1 =
On 8 déc, 16:20, gst wrote:
> On 8 déc, 15:51, Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > gst wrote:
> > > nb: so this "hack" is only relevant during dev ; once the project
> > > would be finished the "hack" could be removed (i.e :
On 8 déc, 16:20, gst wrote:
> even with the "assert(self is _self)" in the "if _self:" condition in
> the new and/or init methods of the class1 ?
damn : in the init method only of course..
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Le mercredi 15 février 2017 10:34:42 UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano a écrit :
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 11:42 pm, poseidon wrote:
>
> > Yes, removed it (symlink still there) and it still works. But then, what
> > are pth files for?
>
>
> Good question. I don't actually know anyone that uses pth files, so pe
Le mercredi 1 mars 2017 09:25:48 UTC-5, Frank Millman a écrit :
> "Frank Millman" wrote in message news:o93vs2$smi$1...@blaine.gmane.org...
SNIP
>
> If you run this as is, it works.
>
> I added '1/0' at various points, to force an exception.
>
> If I put it in main() or in aenum(), I do not
Hi,
You can subclass M2 from M1 and override only what you need.
Regards,
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
'two' is a so called constant or literal value .. (of that function).
Why not attach it, as a const value/object, to the function itself ? So that a
new string object has not to be created each time the function is called.
Because anyway strings are immutable. So what would be the point to recre
23 matches
Mail list logo
