>
> I suspect it's down to timing.
>
> What you're putting into the queue is a reference to the array, and it's
> only some time later that the array itself is pickled and then sent (the
> work being done in the 'background').
>
> Modifying the array before (or while) it's actually being sent
Il giorno lunedì 11 settembre 2017 12:19:27 UTC+2, Thomas Jollans ha scritto:
> On 2017-09-10 23:05, iurly wrote:
> > As far as I'm concerned, I'm probably better off using double buffers to
> > avoid this kind of issues.
> > Thanks a lot for your help!
> >
>
>
> That should work. Some other th
Hi,
I'm adding logging to a time critical task running resource-constrained
hardware (Raspberry Pi).
I read about the QueueListener/QueueHandler in:
https://docs.python.org/3/howto/logging-cookbook.html#dealing-with-handlers-that-block
and I'm trying to understand how it really works and what's
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 6:56:19 AM UTC+2, dieter wrote:
> > ...
> > Why is the main thread taking up so much CPU?
> > I believe at this point listener.stop() should only be waiting for the
> > helper thread to terminate, which I reckon would be implemented by waiting
> > on a semaphore or som
On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 8:13:46 AM UTC+2, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> On 16/07/18 07:39, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> > On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 6:56:19 AM UTC+2, dieter wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>> Why is the main thread taking up so much CPU?
> >>> I beli
