On Jan 10, 11:45 am, r wrote:
> We need TK 8.5's themes. This will bring Tkinter out of the dark ages
> and into the 21st Century! And improve the shine of the Python base
> distro. Python could use a good boost right now!
Could someone please explain what Tix provides compared to what the
new st
On Jan 12, 9:36 am, mk wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I googled and googled and can't seem to find the definitive answer: how
> to *properly* deinstall egg? Just delete the folder and/or .py and .pyc
> files from Lib/site-packages? Would that break anything in Python
> installation or not?
As an as
On Jan 14, 9:20 am, sturlamolden wrote:
>
> In either case, Qt will be available under the same licensing terms as
> wxWidgets.
>
> As of today, the main reason to prefer wxPython over PyQt is the
> license. With an LGPL'd Qt, I'd rather ask what this will mean for
> wxPython.
wx has a nice commu
On Jan 16, 7:05 pm, akshay bhat wrote:
> Hello
> i am calling a program using os.system in python on Linux.
> However in i found that program being executed and soon returned 256.
> but when i ran it using terminal i got proper results.
> Now in case of windows, python waits till the process is fi
I need to make a small, relatively low-traffic site that users can
create accounts on and log into. Scripts must run as cgi (no
mod_python or FastCGI is available). Can anyone recommend a small and
simple web framework for Python, maybe similar to Perl's
CGI::Application?
Or would it just be bette
On Jan 27, 4:52 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
> > I need to make a small, relatively low-traffic site that users can
> > create accounts on and log into. Scripts must run as cgi (no
> > mod_python or FastCGI is available). Can anyone recommend a small and
> > simple web framework for Python, maybe similar
On Jan 27, 4:52 pm, Tim Chase wrote:
> > I need to make a small, relatively low-traffic site that users can
> > create accounts on and log into. Scripts must run as cgi (no
> > mod_python or FastCGI is available). Can anyone recommend a small and
> > simple web framework for Python, maybe similar
On Jan 27, 7:28 pm, James Mills wrote:
>
> One option is to configure Apache with mod_wsgi and just
> use WSGI. Fairly simple really and much like CGI.
This is a shared hosting arrangement, so I don't have the option of
adding an apache module. Also, if it's much like CGI, I don't see what
benef
On Jan 28, 4:57 am, Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>
> What about:http://thraxil.org/code/cgi_app/
>
> (yes, it is a port of CGI::Application, and FWIW it's mentionned on the
> CGI::Application's wiki).
>
Nice find. Thank you. Interesting project. It seems to be only one
fairly short file (perhaps t
On Jan 28, 5:05 am, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
>
> Werkzeug[1] should be in your line, I think.
>
> [1]http://werkzeug.pocoo.org/
>
Again, the solution must work for plain vanilla CGI. I don't have WSGI
available. But thank you.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jan 28, 12:02 pm, Bernard Rankin wrote:
>
> I'm looking to set up a small private wiki, and am looking for
> recommendations.
>
> Some sort of CGI based package that I could just untar somewhere web
> accessable via Apache would be great.
There are a number of them listed at
http://wiki.pyt
On Jan 28, 1:33 pm, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20090128 19:01], excord80 (excor...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> >Again, the solution must work for plain vanilla CGI. I don't have WSGI
> >available. But thank you.
>
> It works for plain CGI. I myself use
On Jan 28, 3:10 pm, Fred Pacquier wrote:
>
> That would be something close to Karrigell...
You know, I stumbled across Karrigell while looking around but was
initially uninterested because of what initially seems like a lack of
direction. That is, they tell you that you can use it any way you
lik
Regarding this blog post:
http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2009/01/importlib-is-now-in-python-31.html
When I use the ``import foo`` statement at the top of my program, I
get a module imported. python has a search path it follows, finds the
module, and makes it available to my program. Works nice. :)
S
I just came across http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/05/29/closure.html
and wanted to try the "canonical example of closures" in Python. I
came up with the following, but it fails:
###
#!/usr/bin/env python
def make_counter(start_num):
start = start_num
def counter():
Is there an easy way to see the number of PyPI packages which have
been ported to Python 3?
Are there any special arrangements necessary for PyPI packages which
have both a Python 2.x version and a Python 3.x version?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 7, 12:21 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Martin>http://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=browse&c=533
>
> Martin> It seems that some package authors only classify with
>
> Martin> Programming Language :: Python :: 3
>
> I did a release for lockfile yesterday which supports 3.0. I ad
Trying to decide which to get started with. Can anyone suggest some
pros and cons to each of them?
Would PyOpenGL be in the same camp as Pygame and pyglet? Do either of
Pygame or pyglet make use of PyOpenGL behind the scenes?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Dec 7, 8:17 pm, "Patrick Mullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 4:43 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> PyOpengl - an opengl wrapper. Version 2 is written in c, version 3
> instead uses ctypes
> Pyglet - an opengl + events/sound/etc wrapper written in ctypes
Does
On Ubuntu, I accidentally manually installed setuptools
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools/0.6c9 (by running the .egg file
as a shell script via sudo), and now realize I should just be using
apt to take care of my system Python packages. I also installed one or
two packages using its ``easy_ins
On Dec 9, 10:04 pm, "Chris Rebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, why do you think apt and not setuptools is The Right Way(tm)?
I like to keep > 1 Python on my computer.
1. First, there's the system Python, which is installed by my OS and
which I try not to mess with too much. I'm guessing Ubun
On Dec 9, 10:15 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 at 18:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Ubuntu, I accidentally manually installed setuptools
> >http://pypi.python.org/pypi/setuptools/0.6c9(by running the .egg file
> > as a shell script via sudo), and now realize I should just be
On Dec 9, 10:29 pm, "Chris Rebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:16 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 9, 10:04 pm, "Chris Rebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> So, why do you think apt and not setuptools is The Right Way(tm)?
>
> > I like to keep > 1 Python on my
On Dec 10, 7:45 am, "Diez B. Roggisch" wrote:
> excor...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > As an aside, I'm a bit struck by how long the setuptools/easy_install
> > manuals are, and a bit dismayed at the lack of an easy_install
> > uninstall command. Thinking of trying life for a while without
> > setuptools
On Dec 9, 10:48 pm, excor...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Anyway, the direction I'm heading is to try and use setuptools *less*.
> It seems like it might be too complicated for me. And, I notice that
> the mailing list for it (distutils-sig, if that's the right one) is
> loaded with questions on how to use
On Dec 19, 11:01 am, walterbyrd wrote:
>
> To me, it seems that this:
>
> print "%s=%d" % ('this',99)
>
> Is much easier, and faster, to type, and is also easier to read and
> understand. [snip]
>
> This (if it's right) is much longer, and requires more special
> characters.
>
> print( "{0}={1}".f
On Dec 4, 2:42 pm, Alan G Isaac wrote:
> Mark Summerfield wrote:
> > "Programming in Python 3:
> > A Complete Introduction to the Python Language"
> > ISBN 0137129297
> >http://www.qtrac.eu/py3book.html
>
> OMG, you really wrote it in Lout?
> I wish you would add to http://www.qtrac.eu/lout.html
>
On Dec 19, 11:58 am, Stef Mientki wrote:
> hello,
>
> I'm considering building a web questionnaire in Python.
> I've made several desktop applications in Python / wxPython,
> but I've no experience in using Python on a webserver,
> and I don't have much knowledge about web applications in general
On Jan 1, 2:37 pm, Kay Schluehr wrote:
> There is no solution to this problem from a Python perspective. Do
> what everyone does right now: [snip]
It still surprises me that no one has implemented the solution for
this yet.
Maybe it's harder than it seems, but it *seeems* like it's just a
matte
You might start by having a look at the wiki:
http://wiki.python.org/moin/NumericAndScientific/Plotting
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Just read this interesting post by chromatic on what features Perl 5
needs right now
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/12/five-features-perl-5-needs-now.html
and he mentions a neat-looking project called ``mod_perlite``. It
sounds like it will be very handy. Anyone working on a ``mod_pylite``?
Ha
On Jan 1, 9:12 pm, s...@pobox.com wrote:
> >>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/12/five-features-perl-5-needs-now.html
>
> >> and he mentions a neat-looking project called ``mod_perlite``. It
> >> sounds like it will be very handy. Anyone working on a
> >> ``mod_pylite``? Has it bee
On Jan 1, 11:40 pm, Graham Dumpleton
wrote:
> On Jan 2, 2:28 pm, excord80 wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 1, 9:12 pm, s...@pobox.com wrote:
>
> > >
> > > >>http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2008/12/five-features-perl-5-needs-now.html
>
> >
You might find this recent blog post interesting:
http://www.mechanicalcat.net/richard/log/Python/Sane_Python_application_packaging__initial_solution
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Does Python work with Tk 8.5? I'm manually installing my own Python
2.6.1 (separate from my system's Python 2.5.2), and am about to
install my own Tcl/Tk 8.5 but am unsure how to make them talk to
eachother. Should I install Tk first? If I put Tk into my home
directory (under "~/opt" most likely),
On Jan 7, 4:00 pm, floob wrote:
> I have been searching for a way to print the official Python
> documentation into some kind of book (for my own uses). I don't
> really care if it's printed on newspaper and bound with elmer's
> glue ... any way I can get relatively recent _official documentation
On Jan 7, 5:14 pm, floob wrote:
> On Jan 7, 1:39 pm, excord80 wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 7, 4:00 pm, floob wrote:
>
> > > I have been searching for a way to print the official Python
> > > documentation into some kind of book (for my own uses).
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
