Re: Python vs. Lisp -- please explain

> Paul Rubin wrote: > I think both of you are missing the point of the question, which is > that Lisp is dynamically typed exactly the way Python is and maps to > Python almost directly; yet good Lisp implementations are much faster > than CPython. But Lisp isn't dynamically typed "exactly the way

import antigravity

Guess what made xkcd today: http://xkcd.com/353/ -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list